Why shouldn't we lynch Relapse? There is no indication that he is town and we can't excuse everything for just "Oh yeah, he is a troll. Let's leave him alone"
The situation right now is we don't even know who mafia are. Other girls? Producers? Relapse told us that they are producers. And if he was just trolling, why would he go back and change it?
Either way, I don't see how lynching him is not beneficial. If he flips scum, the people who defended him are suspicious. If he flips town then the people who voted him are suspicious. He somehow survived two lynches now, and the only reason he did is because of you. And the entire basis of why you're even protecting Relapse is because he is a troll, you aren't even basing it off his actions this game which is outrageous. You're being very scummy TAC....
Let's break this down Kiwi. Because you seemingly need it broken down.
Relapse is acting like a Jester.
We have 2 Jesters lynched, the odds of Relapse being a third are incredibly low.
Thus Relapse is trolling.
Now that we know he is trolling, why should we take any of his "slips" as honest to goodness mistakes?
The assertion he is scum off his slips falls apart when you realize he's always been acting like a goofball, isn't jester and is essentially just causing mayhem.
So, for myself, I have ZERO REASON to believe anything Relapse says accidentally or "accidentally". He isn't playing seriously. He's not doing some meta or trying to sneak by, he's dicking around. You're looking for a strategy where there's nothing but madness. There's nothing to compel us to vote for Relapse once you take his play style and mindset into account.
NOTHING.
Ratgirl said:
How can you be so sure that night immunity is only on godfathers and indies? Especially since there were group dates that night, Bogard could have gained it during a group date or something. He also said that he slept with Poison, and Poison confimed that someone slept with her.
After the first time where you misread Reborn and thought that he was scum pretending to be jester, you should of been more attentive to these types of details yet you did the same thing again to Bogard. Using the same argument. Same strategy. And ultimately, protecitng Relapse again. If this isn't your mafia strategy, what else could it be?
OH MY GOD. HOW IS BOGARD HAVING NIGHT IMMUNITY NOT IMMEDIATELY SUSPICIOUS TO YOU?
Why am I getting flak for picking up on a game mechanic, deciding that, if he does have this mechanic, he's likely scum, and pursuing it?! I am the most active scum hunter in this game. I am the most active player in this game. And I am now being lambasted for trying to win. How is that even happening?!
Bogard's entire playstyle was off. Yes. But what sold me on him was his weak excuse that tied with Sleeping with Peter. Poison Chan never strictly confirmed it. Never. And Bogard never bothered to explain. HELL. He never told us why he didn't comment on why he suddenly gained Night Immunity, as that would help tilt the voting direction towards Beta. He was letting town WASTE TIME with a hidden mechanic he has.
And when pushed (mostly by yours truly,) he makes a few off hand comments and backs away from the game. What am I supposed to do? Decide that Bogard's clean, or jester, off that? When I have a concrete immunity or mechanic revealed, and it doesn't strictly fit that of Jester, I'm going to go after it in this game.
Grapes said:
P.-S. And stop changing my name when you quote me, hoe
What happened?
You know, it's a little funny now that I think about it. I'll wait for Peter-kuns approval before I explain it. But it seems I've garnered the trust of our most important player.