That's a lie because Teach already had Hancock neck on his hand and was threating to break her. He could just do it and then he would 1v1 Rayleigh.
And just like Rayleigh said he wasn't sure he would beat Teach we also had Teach not sure he would beat Rayleigh. That's why he chose the safe option of just getting Koby.
And just like Rayleigh said he wasn't sure he would beat Teach we also had Teach not sure he would beat Rayleigh. That's why he chose the safe option of just getting Koby.
Teach couldn't kill Hancock when Rayleigh can stop him from doing it.
Did Kizaru kill fodder PreTS Zolo?
Rayleigh stopped Kizaru with a kick before Kizaru kills fodder PreTS Zolo.
Rayleigh directly used sword vs Teach, because he wanted to stop Teach before killing Hancock just like Kizaru, only difference directly sword for Teach and only kick vs Kizaru because Teach > Kizaru.
So, when Rayleigh stops Teach from killing Hancock, its 2 v 1.
The difference is PreTS Zolo was a fodder and was already KOed and couldn't help Rayleigh vs Kizaru, while Hancock wasn't KOed, Teach himself said she would turn them to stone if he free her so Hancock would help Rayleigh vs Teach.
Debunked.
Secondly,
Teach would beat Rayleigh but he would lose his stone men, because if he uses Quake DF he would shatter his own men. Rayleigh told Teach, they will give his stone men back if he leaves, Teach accepted it. It was a deal in exchange for his men. Again, you lie lmao.
The point is, ''Haki master'' Rayleigh, admitted he is ''pretty certain'' he couldn't beat Teach,
that only proves Rayleigh sensed Teach's Haki level, and Teach's Haki level was around Rayleigh's Haki level, if there was big Haki level difference Rayleigh would beat Teach without giving his stone men, and Teach couldn't kidnap Koby before leaving.