Search results

I've suggested people with high mastery in Armament or Observation can likely access Conqueror Coating, so there's nothing wrong with that even if they aren't Conqueror Specialists.

Explain it. If Armament Haki isn't related to Black Blades then what is? You guys are clowns 🤡

Why don't you go ahead and explain that thought to everybody. Blade Blades are not related to Armament Haki?

That's 4 times they've repeated this now I think I caused their brains to start short circuiting or something damn bots

As far as I'm concerned, I'm the only person here making any sense, so no. I can defend my arguments, but you guys can't defend yours without using circular logic and misnomers (and insults). All you're going to do is repeat yourselves, trust me, there's nothing scary about that.

If you continue saying that people should consider it spam. 1766949790 It's too bad this discussion devolved into these guys just repeating that. That's 3 times in a row, now. The quality of the discussion has dropped greatly. I don't think these guys even addressed a single one of my points...

Talent for Conqueror Haki doesn't change just because you lose an arm. In both Shanks' and Eustass Kid's cases, their Conqueror haki wasn't reduced by a loss of an appendage. What a loss of an appendage would affect is the Armament proficiency Shanks has because it relies more on physical...

Look at how these people repeat themselves. Circular af.

Well, we've discovered the fallacy. - The Hakiman Vs. Swordsman argument was fallacious from the beginning. Swordsmen are a type of Hakiman among 3 types of them. In the end, it has become Hakiman Vs. Hakiman, and they're hoping an Armament Specialist will beat a Conqueror Specialist. That's...

Not even gonna justify him with a response. 1766945666 So, you see, despite the author himself stating that Luffy, Zoro, and Sanji are Haki Specialists with specific types, guys like him will ignore that to maintain his position. Those arguments only kind of worked when we knew very little about...

What is a Haki specialist? - They come in three types. Conqueror, Armament, and Observation specialists. - Conqueror Specialists have a high proficiency or potential for Conquerors Haki. - Armament Specialists have a high proficiency or potential for Armament Haki. - Observation Specialists have...

Exactly that part of the discussion goes completely ignored. If you don't know what specialists are then I'm sorry but we're not reading the same story. You bros are reading Two Piece.

Again, this is an oversimplification of the power system that ignores the fact specialists exist.

Actually, Occam's Razor doesn't mean what you think it does and doesn't apply in the way you think. - My idea is the idea with the fewest assumptions, and is therefore the simplest one. - Your idea is the idea with several assumptions to force everything to be the same. Big difference.

So you're allowed to oversimplify and I'm not allowed to "overcomplicate" it. That's how you argue? You know what the pattern is? Each time the haki system gets more complex, you end up oversimplifying it. It's probably pseudoscience which is a lot trickier.

Don't oversimplify for your agenda.

Want to just call each other retards for the rest of the day? You obviously prefer reinforcing your beliefs and picking arguments.

That wasn't stated. It said he had greater swordsmanship, you're adding all the other stuff. Swordsmanship by itself likely falls under Armament Specialist proficiency. The moment you start calling Conqueror Coating an Armament Specialist's trait is the moment this all gets mixed up.

Circular reasoning used by a vocal minority.