Search results

people's opinion over something they barely remember is rather irrelevant. Or rather, a fragment of what they want to believe rather than logical conclusion

You guys really shouldn't comment here when your memory of the series is so shit that you confuse Kiba with Naruto lmao

Concession accepted. You never addressed any of my arguments directly. Live in your fantasy that being an orphan makes it understandable to brutalize your savior for being derp or being taught to respect women as a child makes it understandable to be a borderline pedophile sexual predator...

Nami money chase muh hitting Sanji muh pervyyyy Zolo omg south is down Etc Speaks volumes on how insane this fanbase is when they take these gags that happen so often so seriously then try to make it deep Do people realize making it deep doesn't really help? Like Sanji's past in no way...

As I said, man If you don't see it, you do you. You'd have a point if Nami only did in early 100s chapters. But it's clearly just a continuous gag unaffected by her growth or character (nor would it be justified anymore) Because it's not meant to be deep or anything but a gag. Like Sakura's...

You don't need to. It's counted by people who have read Manga. And Sakura barely does it. And you missed the entire point of my post. Nami brutalizing Luffy, the man who saved her life and family and city and dream and existence, hundreds of chapters and in-verse years into story over something...

Is a known count. The dumb notion was overblown so much. And again, just a gag. Almost all female leads of 90s do it as much if not much more, including Nami. For little immediate reasons too. It's just that Sakura happens to be the only one who not only rejected the MC crushing on him but...

Really not. There are only 16 panels of Sakura hitting him in 700 chapters and most are gag (and some are rather wholesome sibling'ish, like after Pain defeat), and some have Naruto behaving like a literal sexual predator. Which is whatever too because that's also a gag. You've only watched...

Naruto and Sakura's obsession with Sasuke should make sense to anyone who has read Part I properly. Unironically far better written than Zoro's insane loyalty toward Luffy, which is something with shit development. Or Luffy's inhibit supernatural level of care toward his Nakama. A lot of One...

never happened. Sakura was insanely loyal to her friends. Unless you're talking about Part I where Sakura was desperately asking Sasuke to take her with him. If you consider that poor writing, idk man you do you. The way she acted then was very well in accordance with a 12 years old who has...

She doesn't have that personality whatsoever. She's rather feminine actually The punching thing is relatively nonexistent in manga too and usually happens when Naruto is actually being an ass or perverted. Nami does it way more in canon.

Sakura is a better character than Nami fight me Hell even the "she hits mc so annoying" gag is 10x more frequent with Nami

Zoro fans are the architect of their own unhappiness

Lmao... not even 5

Resurgence of 4chan. Found in 5 days

EoS Sasuke is anything but. Sasuke was relative to Lee in Taijutsu in P1 alone. Lee has no confirmed significant improvement thereafter while EoS Sasuke is massively better

Immediate post-clash. Thus not a traditional blitz. Unless you can show a scan of Oda or Marco confirming the impact and aftermath clash did absolutely nothing to hinder his reaction What you or I think it "looked" like doesn't matter. It's a specific example where a 3rd factor (clash) is...

So in every clash if the winner of the clash touches the loser afterward, the loser got blitzed? Lmao Fucking hell. Call it whatever you want, it is not the same as a character just standing there and another blitzing them. Losing a clash can make you disoriented, physically at prone position...

No. He lost the clash. Winning a clash and hitting/grabbing the other character in its aftermath is not a clean blitz or even blitz at all

BM never blitzed Marco. They clashed.