You are probably right but if i learned anything from the elections its that we dont know what result will get out of the chest. How media and people think are very different and it will change a lot if 1 person says the wrong thing
No thats bullshit reasoning. The intention doesnt matter in this situation its a dangerous play with contact and it would be foul anywhere on the pitch including in the box. It doesnt matter if the ball is out of his foot or not.
1720690640
Also Saka handball doesnt count the hand in a natural...
It doesnt matter if he sent a ball or not. I foul a player after he sent the ball so it shouldnt count is what you are saying to me. What the dutch player did was a dangerous play. It was an amateur mistake. Its a penalty but the yellow is up to the referee. I agree yellow maybe a bit harsh but...
There is a contact to Kanes foot how its terrible call. If you come by showing the sole of the foot to the opponent in this way, it will be a direct kick if there is a contact does. The penalty is correct.
Its not even referee VAR corrected him because there was a penalty. VAR's call and the penalty was correct. There are shit decisions all in this euro but this isnt one of them.
Could be but it doesn't matter if Kane hits after he hits because the Dutchman puts the sole of his foot on the axis of the shot so it's a foul.
This is a foul no matter where you do it on the field.
You have no idea about the rules then he hits the Kanes foot. It doesnt matter how Kane has reacted. There is a clear foul he shouldnt have hit his foot. Thats why VAR call was correct too. We shouldnt judge penalties which team we want to win.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.