Search results

Don't worry, it's not a big deal. It was a nice tournament. It just reveals a lot about the place of women in general in the manga industry and in the eyes of people. There is still a long way to go.

Mouai

Unlikely. You probably dealt with liberals, but probably not with materialist like me. People of that kind don't understand how systems work, they don't get how and why something should be created or kept in order to create a healthy place while maintaining a healthy freedom. I'm not of that...

:kayneshrug:

I see

:handsup:

Soo.. how many women managed to get into the top 30 ? :catsure:

Quit your strawman mate. You are in moral panic mode. Indeed. Look where we are. A forum that is dying on the flag of edgyness. Cool story bro Indeed I'm free to yap :) Sure pal :whitepress: "ridiculous" when all I ask is a little bit of responsibility. You are jokin. And no, I won't...

The context are completely different and no, I do not propose for negativity to be banned. So yes, it is a fallacy Fine. I don't care anymore. Do what you want. I will only reply to the critics. And if you don't want to deal with what I propose, you will eventually have to deal with people like...

That's a moral panic. You know full well this is not what I proposes. Stop the strawman and fallacies. Yes. A compartimentalization is needed. Without it , hate becomes the norm under this system. This must change unless you like hate. Positivity needs room to grow. This doesn't mean...

What I propose is not "unfair" it's the ethical way to organize a community space where people from both sides are saying "don't". It's not difficult, it's the understanding that negativity AND positivy are the result of system and not moderations. Again, you need a systemic understanding to...

Really what needs to happen is not that difficult: - Better moderation of oppressive behaviors (bigotry/racism/sexism/Transphobia etc.) - Compartmentalization of the posivity AND the negativity > In other word you keep the critics on one side and the rest on the other. - Insentive for positive...

Why am I not surprised ? Exactly, that's my issue. There is enjoyement left since people are obviousely staying. Which means that this hatred, is mainly performative. It's a way to connect with others and I get that, problem, this negativity impacts other people too. People need to drop the...

Inclusivity is not the tolerance of intolerance pal Yes. Got a problem with that? :beckmoji:

I believe you. But what I propose is different. You will need some notions of political materialism to understand that. I propose a promotion of positivity through the restructuration of the forum, not a negation of negativity. You are looking at highly moderated areas, thinking that I want to...

Yes. People are still engaged. Meaning that the wave of critics that I see are actually performative ways to gain validation rather than anything else. As for the critics in themselves, I have yet to see critics that holds on good basis and not simply on bad reading practices and bad...

Critics are fine. A flow of trashing is not. It's either the testimony of a problem with the content OR a problem with the fanbase. And the content is fine. In fact it's even fire on objective technical narrative levels. Yes, it's not perfect, but it's absolutely not something that deserve this...

Again, you guyz need to understand that I have critics of One Piece that will make even haters call me a hater. Really, understand this: when I tell you that you guyz are not making real critics. You are using this forum as a tool of validation through the dissing of One Piece.