Dude still insists that acoc cant be channeled through blades even after he saw Roger doing it and called it "pirate fight not swordsmen fight" and you think the SFX will convince him ?
I dont even know whats in this @Rootbeer guy's mind. Dude just google your "opinion" about Zoro not having acoc and you will get the answear, its really simple. My opinion is that Makino would beat WB & Kaido together, prove me wrong.
Man why dont you just reread the chapter or just google it? I already told you its confirmed. Its like saying Ace is not dead because we didnt see Marco diggin the grave.
When something is confirmed our opinion doesnt matter. As i said you could just reread the chapter or you know.. just google it and you will find the answear.
Yes this guy has won the prize of absurdness. Never mind the hakiman/skill madness, this guy seriously insists even now that Zoro doesnt even has acoc.
I never claimed that Mihawk has or has not a DF. I just followed your data book facts man. You already confirmed that Shanks is a swordman so thats good.
Because you brought up the facts saying Shanks is a master swordsman and not a brawler or haki blaster and now you turn around the conversation and fail time after time to provide a single evident of someone stating that Shanks is anythting else.
Sure but you argue with official data book facts that confirms Shanks as a master swordsman. Now provide a link from the manga/VC/databooks stating that Shanks is anything else than master swordsman.
You argue with statements from databooks. Your data book stated that Shanks is a master swordsman . Your data book statements says nothing about CoC haki blasts.
Your statement was that Shanks CoC scared the shit out of a Logia Admiral and i told you Zoro without even CoC who is levels below Mihawk did the same to a Logia user not that strong as an Admiral of course. These are the only 2 instances we know so far.
What was "said" in Film Red was cope...
Why are you guys still trying to argue with "muh hakiman" people ?
They think that Shanks is not a swordsman because his title box doesnt state " The second strongest swordsman in the world".
Like Oda would ever do shit like this. We never saw a "2nd best title in WSM or WSC" same case is WSS...
Guess Fujitora is stronger than Mihawk given that Mihawk wont fight a swordsman with DF and no skills.
Now put Shanks in there who doesnt even have a DF and 1+1=2. No hakiman headcannon statements.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.