Search results

"Luffy isn't using CoC/FS/CoA/is bluffing!" It's already written.

Oda is very inconsistent with the drawings. Also, we don't see the charging of the hits and it's only one page. Even logically speaking, it does not make any sense. But it was almost the same with G5.

Kaido defended against some, but most of the time didn't even bother because they weren't doing anything to him, basically. If Luffy had hit him, Kizaru would have suffered much more than Kaido.

Kizaru seems a defense expert, is clearly using a tenichque of his fruit and the Snakeman is not as strong offensively as the Boundman. It's a good showing, but not that far off.

The same lightning you can see in Jinbe vs WW or Ulti vs Luffy? Or even better in Luffy vs Katakuri, as I have already said? Not once you can see haki trails like 1010 (with a much weaker CoC, I might add) or the no touching (bar for the Bajarang gun only, and even then Luffy spoked only about...

Oda is very inconsistent with the drawings. Also, we don't see the charging of the hits and it's only one page. Even logically speaking, it does not make any sense. But it was almost the same with G5.

He drew an entire fight of G5 vs Kaido. If he wanted to draw G5 using CoC, it would have been really simple to do so and he didn't. There ends the discussion regarding CoC.

The problem is that in all the fight with Kaido there isn't a single instance of a haki trail or no-touching (bar for the Bajatang gun, but mostly because Luffy said it). If we randomly took panels of G5's fight without knowing anything, the haki usage would be totally indistinguishable from the...

No doubt, but what I am saying is that we only saw one panel of the "fight", we didn't see the charging of the hits and Oda is totally inconsistent with drawings. Honestly, isn't the pic I posted in G5 totally comparable to a random CoA usage of DR or WC? We only know it was ACoC because Kaido...

Then why Kaido said in that exact page that Luffy is using CoC, though? And also, there isn't a single attack in the fight with haki trails like the one we saw in 1010 from Luffy. Actually, logically speaking, even if Kaido did not say it out loud, what reasons Luffy could have to not use CoC...

Then that's G5 and Kaido not using CoC, I presume:

Only his phrase about no killing Vegapunk concerns me. Could it be that Kizaru has his own agenda?

Speaking about rereading comprehension :

Kaido literally said Luffy was using CoC in that instance.

Who knows. Oda Is unpredictalble in drawings. But the trails are conquerors, we know because se saw back in 1010. Only, there isn't any in G5 whilst Kaido explicitly said Luffy was using CoC.

Yeah, bur what I am saying is that Kaido himself said he was using CoC ; it's not our assumption. Even though, there isn't a single scene of G5 with the haki trails or the no touching (again, bar the Bajarang gun, but is more talk than seeing). If we had seen the G5 without Kaido's words, just...

The problem Is: not only Kaido said G5 was using CoC, but there isn't a single scene in which you can see the "trail" or the no touching (bar the Bajarang gun, but it's mostly Luffy saying about it more then seeing it). All G5 attacks connected and all of them did not have trail as we saw back...

Truly. Seems like Oda is doing on purpose; too many, really too many inconsistencies.

G5 (or Kaido in some scenes) did not have any of that though : Oda is totally inconsistent in how to draw haki.

The fact that you said they will have a conversation next chapter after Kizaru is set free. It means you think Kizaru doesn't want to kill Vegapunk and has another agenda.