I'm not disputing the Scabbards of not using Ryou/Haki, but you make it sound like a Wano samurai or any swordsman can only cut with advance haki and that is not true. I just show you the panel Kawamatsu blowing enemies away with a Ryou/Haki attack. Are you going to ignore that???
Also...
Hyogoro then goes onto show Luffy how to use the technique without a sword.
So far, anyone that uses Ryou/Haki with a sword or any blade weapon has sent the enemy flying backwards. I don't understand this notion that haki looks different because they are a swordsman. Can they use it...
I already provided a panel where Hyogoro said Ryou is Haki. What Hyogoro was explaining was how to use Haki/Ryou as an external force. We saw Rayleigh use it against the elephant. We saw Sentomaru use it against Luffy. We also saw the Admirals use it to block Whitebeard's Shock.
Stop it. Ryou is just the Wano terminology for Armament Haki. And guess what Sanji also has it too. If Zoro haki is so advance, how come he did not cut Doflamingo's birdcage.
Your Kalifa analogy is terrible. Saying someone is capable of inflicting damage on someone else because a weaker person can is not the same as saying someone using a technique because a weaker opponent can. You have to learn a technique.
Zoro has not displayed the necessary Haki skills...
What does Kalifa have to do with this argument??? And what skillset does Zoro have to damage Kaido that Sanji can't utilize??? Zoro having a sword?? Really??? Because Luffy wants to take down Kaido and he isn't using a sword.
I swear some of the Zoro fans think people are suggesting that...
Is it so wrong to think that Sanji maybe able to inflict damage on Kaido???? Sanji is considered a big shot among the Tobi Roppo and Queen acknowledges Sanji as being an obstacle against Kaido.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.