Search results

Nop

He says Oda's comments about his own story dont matter when it comes to my analysis. He says his analysis provide actual factual evidences while Oda is just being humble when he says he created/thought of xyz character 10 chapters ago (like Super novas, roof top fight, Shanks coming to Wano for...

No, wrong. Saying the same thing again and again wont change the facts. Wano is great? One Piece stan spotted

Its ok if it takes time, but what matters is the end result. Sorry to say, Wano arc was not great. Usually, more time spent on a project = better quality. But this is not the case for Wano. He could take another year to stretch out the fights or do sth else to make Luffy's awakening and...

Yeah, that's what I said about Wano.

Say it again, reiterate your point so that I can understand what you actually mean by "core concepts".

Are you doing this on purpose or are just clueless?

You cant compare Pre TS to Post TS. Pre TS > Post TS. Brook scenario was good, but what about Wano? What if the process of doing things is utter BS that it makes ending (or getting to core concept) distasteful? Does doing one thing right gives a free paas to do 10 things wrong?

Then what about the shit that happened in between? If the core concepts is all that matters, then why to extend the arc for 4-5 years? It is like going from point A to B, why use car to travel 1000 km, when you can jump to point B?

What are you even talking about? Are you saying Oda wanted to show the Dawn at the end of Wano and successfuly did that? Is this what you are focusing on?

Clear vision? Like he had clear vision of ending One Piece in 5 years? Like he said Luffy wont beat Kaido through a bigger punch?

Response 1: Oda planned this arc for 10+ years Response 2: Who gives a shit if he made changes and how he executed it Listen, longetivity is not always the best. Oda is an unconclusive writer. I repeat, UNCONCLUSIVE WRITER. He can use bait-and-switch method to fool the audience, but the end...

Plus, I am tired of hearing One Piece is weekly manga, it is not for everyone, lol. I am 27, and I have been reading mangas since 2012-13. I am saying this after reading One Piece for more than 11 years. How long have you been reading OP?

You cant make this shit up. I dont know where you get you information, but Oda has admitted that he changed roof top fights for chapter 1000 celebration. He introduced Shanks to promote film RED. He forced the Tama-Ace timeline, later he said it was a mistake and corrected it (IIRC). More...

I already shared the comparison of Luffy with Tom & Jerry. Plus, imaginative powers, especially the way Luffy uses them, are exactly the same as in The Mask movie. Cliche is still a cliche no matter how you use it. It is too extreme to be called a simple diversion. Others also awaken, but their...

Dont go off topic. Stick to the point; Explain how using concepts and panels from other stories is not lazy writing? How cliche can be good when it comes to One Piece? Why bait-and-switch method is being praised as the best thing in fiction?

Duh, it is One Piece, aka Master Piece. Everything makes sense in it because it introduced the concept of imaginative powers first time ever.

Tbh, I always expected something like this. Whenever the author decides to milk the series, and keep on dragging the show, things like this are bound to happen. One Piece has never been in my Top 5.

Imagine waiting for 16 years for Luffy vs Kaido only to find out it is Tom & Jerry 2.0.

Explain to me in a serious way how using other stories' concepts and even replicating panels is not lazy?