Search results

Exactly, its way better.

Okay. Then look at my thread an explain me precisely where you are disagreeing exactly please.

Okay. Let be productive On what definition do you think I'm wrong here ?

Dude.. I'm not stating an opinion here lmao. Your sentence feel like this to me. "The sun is a star" "We don't agree with you". Okay.. but the sun is still a star lmao.

No. Storytelling is a skill just like when you play from an instrument. But yeah of course, you can always give a violin to a kid for the first time and say that their music is amazing.. but I'll bet you won't stand in front of it for more than 1 hour lmao. In storytelling there are rules...

Yes, it will be impossible in this instance. As I can't be wrong here. I'm just stating facts. At the limit, I can be wrong on the "this is the best writing in history or the paragraph about the strawhat skills" but that's all.

It is objective. Storytelling is a skill, there are things we can mesure. And this plot twist was perfect from a storytelling standpoint. Objectively. But you are completely in your right not to like the technique while understanding that it is masterfull. Like I said, it's just like...

And what what ?? I'm sorry, I'm lost lol

Dude.. I can't be wrong on a storytelling fact. The prouesse of Oda on this plot twist doesn't depend on my opinion. Its objectively masterfull. From a straight technical standpoint. What ? Look what ? Okay, and ?

I want people who are trying to sh*t on the work of Gear 5 here to really take a Nobody is preventing people to give their opinion. I'm just saying that giving a bad statement about an objective good technique is not legitimate. You can of course say "this is masterfull, but I don't really like...

Yes for a good reason, and I maintain everything I said. Despite being wrong, all my point were valid to place Carrot as more than just a side character. And if you analyze what I said at the time, I never said that the possibility was a 100% probability. The storytelling facts are still here...

Dude.. I can't really do more on that site lol. If you don't want to read, that's okay

Yeah and Oda said he would finish the story in 5 years. It took him 26. let's not take all of Oda's sentence seriously. Especially when he is trying to be modest and carefree. What counts is what the story tells us. The story IS deep from a narration and a thematic/storytelling standpoint. This...

No.

This is what I call a hint. (I mentionned the firery air for exemple) Its an interpretation of an image that does not serve the story contrary to the goofyness of Luffy during pretimeskip or his transformations. uh, no ? Nothing here negates gear 5 amazing direction mate. Still not a retcon...

Like I said in my thread, I do not care about what Oda says about his story, I only verify if the story works or not. As one of the most important thing you must retain from my thread is that plantings are RETROACTIVES.

And that's cool.

:saturn:

No name :sanmoji: Could very well be the case. This is one of my biggest questionnement about Oda. Is he a natural or a technician.. I don't think we will never have an answer to that. 1691173471 I agree that there is an inconsistancy regarding Carrot. I would even say, an error.. but until...

Don't confuse a status and the evolution of a character. Carrot went from simple soldier to Queen. This is not something that happens to side character that usually keep their status. I called no one a One Piece hater. :sanmoji: No, I don't like to theorize, I don't like to spoil myself the story.