Its a valid argument based on the assumption that someone inferior who has the same ambition has manifested it for the sake of his said ambition and his rival also happens to be a conquerer who he never lost to.
Its valid possibility but not an argument for it realistically being the case.
If...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.