Search results

And even if it was quantum mechanics, you have me, albeit I'm still studying the basics.

In before because "he had just one arm but his CoA was good enough"

He won't cause there's no sensible reason to believe that he is not one. He doesn't lack swordsmanship, that would be outright insane.

Stop making fanfictions Erkan. It's a hassle. You should be considering to start putting effort into comprehending what we are telling to you instead of being so redundant and sterile.

Nothing new then

When did he even claim that

At least you eventually grasped it bud, whether or not you are a Mihawk fan, that's inconsequential. What matters is being capable to witness that in no fiction an author refers to "Strongest Swordsman" without implying total individual strenght. The skill/style stuff is wholly made up, always...

Who told you he wasn't in the first place. We have no confirmation, but the other way around also applies Erkan. You can't claim that the stock is empty before you look into it.

Who was the strongest acknowledged swordsman of Roger's era assuming Roger was a swordsman and he was? The answer wanders within the very phrase.

Erkan Who was the WSS by the time of Roger? Roger and Primebeard are portrayed to be evenly matched. Are you still here?

Yes and I meant WS titles. No reason to specify that in a forum full of OP fans.

I was talking about WS stuff.

What's funny is that there's actual ground for EoS Fujitora > EoS Shanks

What's even sadder is believing that Oda would make such a big deal of a title that makes one just YC3 level. Imagine Oda portraying something so blatantly for just that.

What's the problem if Shanks was just a swordsman? Isn't Mihawk the strongest of all of them?

He just slipped cause he's inadvertently admitting that Shanks is a swordsman while he first had inferred he was not.

Their arguments were never consistent to me. First they believed Shanks was a swordsman, then they figured overstating the WSS matter was alone not enough, and after catching the L on the subject matter, they took shelter in this absurd thing about Shanks lacking swordsmanship.

Apparently Shanks is a CoCman according to someone here.

Erkan why would Shanks not be a swordsman? And why can you conceive that he's rather something else? If yes what? This is being patently amiss on purpose.

I have heard of no fiction in which someone is labeled as "Strongest Swordsman" and yet the overall individual strenght is not also implied, and they accuse us of mental gymnastics, unbelievable. They really think that Oda crafted skill titles, all titles so far known are strictly power level...