Search results

Without the second element, it's not a parallel.

You literally can't have a parallel without two things.

If you remove one line, is it still a parallel? Parallels are literally incomplete without two things. Also, a lot of One Piece parallels are opposite things happening. Compare how Luffy defeated Crocodile to how he defeated Doflamingo. Both were meant to mirror each other, but one went up and...

Then how can it be a parallel?

You're saying parallels don't need two things to complete each other?

Does parallels need complementary things?

"Or analogous." Analogous Having analogy; corresponding to something else; bearing some resemblance or proportion (often followed by "to".) Another definition for opposite Of either of two complementary or mutually exclusive things.

Yes they are. 1694136316 Hell, the Blackbeard Pirates parallel the Straw Hats yet are polar opposites to them.

That's because Teach is the evil version of Newgate. It's even in their epithets: Blackbeard and Whitebeard.

Sakazuki may not be Luffy's last major battle, but he will be one of them.

They can replace five-digits of people in such a short span of time? Not if Ryokugyu and Fujitora get their asses kicked in the the aforementioned arc.

Beating Sakazuki demoralizes the Marines thus weakens Imu's forces.

You need to pick one.

Lodestar Teach VS Shanks & Ben (becomes new WSM) Shiryu VS Mihawk (becomes new WSS) Blackbeard Pirates VS Red-Hairs Luffy VS Sakazuki Kid VS Ryokugyu/Fujitora Law VS Ryokugyu/Fujitora Revolutionary Army VS Holy Knights Laugh Tale Luffy VS Teach Straw Hats VS Blackbeard Pirates Post Laugh...

Teach is really a mixture between Newgate and Xebec as much as Luffy is a mixture between Roger and Shanks. Kaido also had Xebec parallels.

Shanks and Sakazuki fall together.