Search results

Yeah, it is kind of a nonsensical argument. I mean, time travel is ok, but for some reason there being some sort of ramification for said time travel is just going to far?

Exactly. The way I see it, is that there needs to be some kind of cause and effect aspect to come into play here. For every action an equal and opposite reaction. Time travel in all forms of fiction are always tricky, but no matter what kind of time travel happens (Forward or backwards), they...

I don't know, maybe my point wasn't clear enough. Yes, in One Piece there is only one singular, linear timeline, and time as we understand it, is consistent. A child is born, and through the passage of time eventually grows older and dies. One Piece has a theme in which deals with "The Flow...

But that's the thing. There should be future versions of themselves in the current timelines, because they don't belong there. Them getting sent to the future is what removes their future selves from the timeline. So their future selves who should exist, don't.

Yeah, I was going to address that in the OP, but forgot. Remember, Toki is the owner of the Time-Time fruit. She has control over time, so technically the general rules might not apply to her.

So we know that the Scabbards were all thrust from the past, 20 years into the Future. But the way Oda chose to go about this is different than any form of Future Time travel we've seen in other works of fiction. Typically when a person travels from the past into the Future, there is always a...