Search results

First of all, a person who speaks of himself in third person and mocks Kaido for having a fish fruit (as if dragons weren't related to fishes) is both laughable and ignorant, so I'd appreciate you not to think of yourself too highly to call others "clowns". Regarding your mention, I didn't take...

What Roger did could be done with many weapons as far as we've seen, and where your reasoning fails is that this isn't about Zoro and Roger both doing something that isn't necessarily swordsmanship but Roger not doing something Zoro does on a regular basis and is indeed swordsmanship (relying on...

I'm not applying my headcanons here because I'm not discussing whether Roger was a swordsman or not but showing how failed the reasonings used here are (which doesn't mean their premise is wrong, in that case we'd be comitting an ad logicam fallacy); you are just a messy reasoner. Seriosuly...

That's not how logic works, hence my post; the reasoning is failed because a swordsman being able to send shockwaves with a sword doesn't mean every person sending shockwaves with a sword is a swordsman. Zoro using the sword as a catalyst isn't proof that Roger is a swordsman in the terms the OP...

The reasoning itself here is irrelevant and missing the point whether the premise is or not true because the point isn't whether Zoro can or not send shockwaves but whether Roger mainly used his sword as a catalyst instead of a cutter or not.