Search results

Yes referring to the attacks used Because it would change his aim. If you can't get damaged =/= can't get affected I never said he was scared of COC. He was scared of Zoro's attackPotency. Again actively blocking with body is something several characters have done. Even Sanji did it against...

By Zoro's statement, that is what King was doing. Again you are conflating clashing of swords to blocking. In King's case he had to because otherwise, he would get hit and deviate He wouldn't though be a King's act of blocking was out of feat as Zoro pointed out. The attacks Zoro was using...

Clashing swords does not always mean blocking. Both characters attacking at the same time. He dodged in order to shoot at Zoro. Queen is not King though. Yes blocking with his leg was called out as actively blocking. Both statements can exist at the same time. Zoro's statement about their...

First one is just a clash of swords Second one is a dodge because he was shooting lasers Yes he is blocking with his leg which doesn't change the fact of active blocking. This has been addressed, it is because it is the most effective way. From that first panel, Zoro then goes on to question...

Actually he was only clashing. The only time he blocked before COC was when he covered himself with his wings against tatsumaki. COC increased Zoro's AP especially when he was releasing COA in addition unrestricted I checked again, yes you are right about the sequence. Interestingly though...

But what does that have to do with him being invincible in flame mode? It he was blocking in flame off mode then you would be right. However, here, he wad blocking in flame on mode which you say is invincible. I am quite sure he made that statement right after he healed from bird dance and...

That is contradicted by the qualifier "almost" Why was he scared when he is "invincible" in flame mode? That statement was made after he called out for blocking in flame mode Which does not dispute what I said. The fact that he ended up hitting flame off is irrelevant to the fact that he did...

True because that is more effective Why was it called out at that moment specifically though? Why did King affirm with "I realize the threat you represent"? It is also based on the fact that Zoro went into his final attack with no care about Flame off or Flame on and basically challenged King...

I don't see how the two are even comparable especially when there is a clear difference between "he is invincible" and " he is almost invincible" For Zoro not harming King on panel, we already have statements from King and Zoro directly implying Zoro can. I don't see why you need to see...

What about Zoro's statement puts assumptions to doubt? Saying "almost Invincible" does support the notion of what happened in Zoro vs King 1678358932 Why you keep omitting "almost" qualifier though

Do you need to see something happening in order to conclude that such a thing can happen?

"Almost" invincible. Which further supports my point

It is implied that flame on wouldn't have made much of a difference from the fact that King started blocking Zoro's attacks even with flame on

Zoro to King : why are you blocking my attacks, I thought my attacks didn't not affect you?:kuzanshut:

Guess I was wrong about that one

With his wings:milaugh:

Yes it wasn't shown properly hence my point because King can't clad himself with flames without having his flame on. Everytime he uses flames, he has his flame on

Which part of slings are flames?

How did he make a flame dragon without flames:risitameh:

Try and think a little. King had his defense on during his final attack when he used the flame dragon