Search results

  1. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    Shanks say he got many but BB's one give him PTSD. BB made this scar way early at best he was at commander level or even weaker when he gave that to shanks. However shanks give zero fucks abt other scars. Either mihawk never gave him a scar (which is more likely since we dont see any visible...
  2. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    The best scar he got is from BB which he still got PTSD from it. mihawk already gave zoro a scar and it's there visible even now. oden scared kaido and it's still there after 20 years. zoro bois still dnt know the impact of scars it seems :ihaha: shanks literary got 0 scars like that. why...
  3. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    The fact is there are none he received from mihawk. mihawk put a scar on zoro and it's there still visible on him even now. shanks fear the scar he received from BB more than anything even after all these years. mihawk isnt someone he actually cares abt despite having friendly duels for years...
  4. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    who told u he did? shanks's only scar he ever had was from blackbeard himself. he lost his arm to a sea king. apart from that no injuries are there. same with mihawk. these friendly duels mean actually nothing. if its a real 1 vs 1 then we have akainu vs aokiji fight to death where akainu spared...
  5. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    says the retard who thinks no-sword style is actually a sword style :ihaha: :shame: law teleports using a swords style according to u :suresure: u got retards like @Money D Malio who thinks that :suresure: They cope with the fact that mihawk is a fraud :myman:
  6. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    "It's a swordsman style without a sword" again with brainless statements :cantseeme: according to zoro if u dont have any sword it's no-sword style, not 'sword style with no sword' :suresure: is this some kind of cope? :myman: u dont need to do any mental gymnastics here. as long as u...
  7. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    "It's a swordsman style without a sword" :cantseeme: stopped reading after this retard statement. tf is swordsman style without a sword. The name itself is No-sword style. not a sword style with no sword :suresure: U can literary see ur boi zoro (fraud) named it no-sword style since from...
  8. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    Sword style without a sword :cantseeme: tf is that? :ihaha: if its without a sword then it's No-sword Style. literary as long as u take out swords from the user its no longer sword style. but No-sword style :myman: u still 5 or something? :suresure: 1637141321 @Steven kizaru's...
  9. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    actually crocodile is more important than fraudhawk :suresure: 1637140184 No sword style is whenever zoro doesnt use his swords :ihaha: once u take out swords its no longer swordsmanship. according to ur beloved fraud zoro himself :suresure: u just proved me that we dont know any...
  10. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    Ur Bois zoro the fraud already gave us the answer. No-sword style. once u take out swords u are no longer a swordsmen. which basically confirms what zoro said abt king himself. we still havent see shanks fighting someone. unless u think the clash vs WB was actually a fight :ihaha::risitasad...
  11. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    so? :ihaha: There is nothing wrong with that. we still havent see them fight to their full extent. so far they are both swordsmen. if shanks starts fighting in any other way then he will no longer be a swordsman. Funniest thing is mihawk couldnt beat shanks even prior to him being a yonko...
  12. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    Bolded literary every retarded thing u just said :suresure: First of all where did u get that country level feat from? oh yeah came it out ur ass :suresure: Did mihawk even lift it? :gokulaugh: Zoro in dressrosa cut down pica which was similar to what mihawk did. cutting ice or some soil...
  13. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    Fujitora after the whole act in dressrosa lifted up a whole island worth wreckage to stomp the pirates and sent meteorites against opponents prior to that. Are those feats of a swordsmanship big brain guy? :myman::ihaha: would love to see mihawk,zoro or vista trying to do that :shame:
  14. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    All I know is that he isnt a one piece character. Fujitora is a unique character we got in OP. making a character based on some other character doesnt mean any shit here. zatoichi cant use gravity but fujitora can :myman:
  15. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    Kizaru's main ability is light. Fujitora's main ability is gravity . and here we have retards saying kizaru and fujitora are swordsmen :ihaha: Mihawk is a fraud. no one can change facts :ihaha:
  16. SaitamaSanji

    Character Discussion Why Mihawk has such low relevancy in the story

    10/10 Thread. No 1 fraud in the OP universe. Couldnt beat shanks who wasnt even a yonko by that time. slightly stronger than a YC 1 and a certain retard fanbase (zoro cuckboys) think he is a top tier :ihaha: :shame:
Top