You: If Oda did it, it's canon.
Oda: I did strong world
You: It's ridiculous to even consider that canon because of a throwaway line by Brook two years before the movie was even made.
I'm happy to say that the manga, from vol 1 - vol 98 is canon and nothing outside it is. This means that we...
Nah B. They both are tied together. Either it's both canon and these are minor issues that happened because of practicality reasons (we don't want Brook to not be here), or neither are canon. You can't separate then and say it's canon till page 19 and then page 20 is non canon. That's not a...
Anyway, all the novels in the One Piece magazine are intended to be canon. Not sure whether you think Oda doesn't give his input on them, because he does. If they weren't canon, they wouldn't even state anything new about the characters. They would be inconsequential like a filler arc which...
Oda himself wrote string world with his own hands and you guys don't consider that canon and are still waiting for Shiki. Your consideration means nothing
As far as I see the only things I've seen here is "it's canon until it says something I don't like." If fish fish fruit was in a movie I swear half of you will be saying not canon as if Oda doesn't know his own work
That word "consider" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. Consideration is relevant when you're exchanging a contract for money. Not sure what people in the internet considering a piece of media canon has to do with whether it is canon.
"unofficial".
This is literally the one piece magazine. If the novel says M> YC, then I accept that. Since it's an outright confirmation. If the manga contradicts that, fair. But Manga > novel/databook/anime>>>>>>>>>>>>shit>>>>>> fan rantings in worstgen anyday
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.