But that's not the case.
If someone has a way to recover from damage, it doesn't mean they didn't take damage in the first place.
Even if he is going that route, he's wrong.
Defeating someone takes more than just damaging them?
Like why wasn't Luffy v Kata over in 1 attack?
Luffy damaged him no?
Still can't believe this is a serious argument.
I'm shocked that there are people that are liking that guy's posts.
This is the cancer of agenda-based thinking.
Like just think for 2 seconds.
If damaging Kaido was enough to defeat him. Wouldn't Kaido simply have lost to the scabbards?
You can't just retroactively take away Zoro damaging...
Thank god Orochi is alive.
Zoro fans incorrectly dismissed Orochi being alive because of fear/insecurity that Zoro would fight him.
No need for that, Iโve been saying for months that if Orochi is truly dead, then that would mark the end of ZKK.
Orochi will die from Habakiri, the same way Kaido...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.