The big problem is that when the story goes against what people think. Instead of trying to go back and see what the source of what they claim is an "inconsistency", they simply blame Oda.
Maybe if they went back and checked the original assumptions they made, they would find that they landed to conclusions that weren't necessarily true. But people don't do that.
So people expect Zoro can live after trying to hold the ultimate combination attack by two yonkou but Luffy a Rubber man would be messed up by Blunt attack with lightning which he is immune to? Such logic or such bias?
Yeti cool brothers had noting to do with strength. Its was a gas. Thats not inconsistency. You can get the physically strongest person today and gas would put them to sleep. The Killer situation oda showed it was poison and hungry.
Only sanji fans can look at a scene where zoro ignores being stabbed in the chest, flexes his muscles and killer is too weak to pull his weapon out, and then he one shots killer before taking a nap because he's hungry and say Liller looked like anything but a jobber