yeah sure.....just I don't understand what kind of "difference" you are expecting........like Luffy should "cut" instead of "punch"....character development means what? ...care to explain this so called "character" development?.....always need to put "moody" face just cause he has lost to someone stronger than him or like start making drama out of his loss, brood at the corner and someone should hit him and let him be confident again?.....or just let him rest for wano arc and don't fight big bad guy and sit at the corner right?.......you talk about Luffy, then what does Zoro do "different"....? all he did was cut/cut/cut...."plot armor" is your getaway argument all the time.......yeah, definitely "zoro bias"...not surprising you can't see though.....
He is mad because Luffy solves everything with punching, instead of being wary of Caesar's ability to zap his oxygen he slugged him in close quarters, instead of solving the issue of not enough power and speed to beat Doflamingo he just punched him normally, instead of working out how Katakuri could dodge him and improve himself in some way he just punched him, truly Luffy never learned or tried anything new post time skip :kappa:
 
yeah sure.....just I don't understand what kind of "difference" you are expecting........like Luffy should "cut" instead of "punch"....character development means what? ...care to explain this so called "character" development?.....always need to put "moody" face just cause he has lost to someone stronger than him or like start making drama out of his loss, brood at the corner and someone should hit him and let him be confident again?.....or just let him rest for wano arc and don't fight big bad guy and sit at the corner right?.......you talk about Luffy, then what does Zoro do "different"....? all he did was cut/cut/cut...."plot armor" is your getaway argument all the time.......yeah, definitely "zoro bias"...not surprising you can't see though.....
Why explain something to a wall?
 
Top