What does powerscaling have to do with character writing? Are you just a meathead?
Hancock still hates every other man besides Luffy and Rayleigh, learning nothing from the time a man showed compassion for her sisters that maybe not all men are bad, she was willing to kill her own subordinates and disrespect the woman who helped raise her, and half her screentime is occupied by simping over Luffy and fantasizing about marriage despite his refusals and complete disinterest, rivaling FMI Sanji in flanderization.
Nami went from being a thief who didn't trust anyone and hated pirates, to becoming a pirate herself who could face Enel and boldly claim that she would rather have no treasure at all if she couldn't share it with her friends, as well as lay her life on the line for her crew (Luffy especially) multiple times.
Hancock had that sad backstory and still chose to be a shitty person unlike someone like Koala, who was also a slave to the CDs but turned out to be a good person. How sad a backstory is doesn't matter if further character writing doesn't build off of it. As an example, Brook is frankly mid when it comes to writing - aside from Thriller Bark and WCI - but his backstory was incredibly tear-jerking.
Why I'm trying to reason with a horny meathead, idk. Maybe this will serve as an eye-opener for other people, since Hancock stans tend to be too dumb to understand Nami or other characters properly.
Hancock still hates every other man besides Luffy and Rayleigh, learning nothing from the time a man showed compassion for her sisters that maybe not all men are bad, she was willing to kill her own subordinates and disrespect the woman who helped raise her, and half her screentime is occupied by simping over Luffy and fantasizing about marriage despite his refusals and complete disinterest, rivaling FMI Sanji in flanderization.
Nami went from being a thief who didn't trust anyone and hated pirates, to becoming a pirate herself who could face Enel and boldly claim that she would rather have no treasure at all if she couldn't share it with her friends, as well as lay her life on the line for her crew (Luffy especially) multiple times.
Hancock had that sad backstory and still chose to be a shitty person unlike someone like Koala, who was also a slave to the CDs but turned out to be a good person. How sad a backstory is doesn't matter if further character writing doesn't build off of it. As an example, Brook is frankly mid when it comes to writing - aside from Thriller Bark and WCI - but his backstory was incredibly tear-jerking.
Why I'm trying to reason with a horny meathead, idk. Maybe this will serve as an eye-opener for other people, since Hancock stans tend to be too dumb to understand Nami or other characters properly.