So WB has only a tie with a Roger and never beat him yet everyone called him WSM.
Mihawk never beat , we never heard Mihawk beating Shanks, and everyone called Mihawk WSS. You can see why we can question or have doubts about those titles and their worth.
If someone tie you you’re not the strongest you are the co strongest at best. Roger was the top dog of his era and WB never beat him and fought him in the past.
I don’t think Zoro will have a superior swordsman of his era for multiple reasons : Zoro will be stronger than Shanks, Shanks will be dead, and Shanks is no more in the race
doesnt matter if shanks is dead to me
he is chasing after the legitimate strongest swordsman.
"
So WB has only a tie with a Roger and never beat him yet everyone called him WSM.
Mihawk never beat , we never heard Mihawk beating Shanks, and everyone called Mihawk WSS. You can see why we can question or have doubts about those titles and their worth."
"yet everyone called him WSM."
not just everyone
the author included.
thats the greatest thing about this all
its as simple as having the author decide who to give the titles to
fandom can throw whatever they want and it
and spin it however they like
its not a rumor
its not people say
its definitive . so at this point you would have to ask yourself why the author labeled mihawk the strongest swordsman and not shanks with the latter and him having many duels over the years.
matching the title holder doesnt make you the title holder rayan
no such thing as co title holders for obvious reasons.