I don't see any problem on hosting two games at the same time. I am one of those players who misses out on a sign up thread and I end up having to wait for the next sign up thread to open for me to sign up or I end up having to sign up as a sub. Sometimes it is hard joining a game as a sub because other players who sign up as a sub respond faster than me.
- Status
its like an open buffet. u see all those games and sign up to what u want lol
i think NF started dying when the OG players and hosts started leaving cuz of irl, then totally crumbled after mbxx wiped it. players just moved over here cuz its more active / younger player base. NF as a website is dying as a whole, not the mafia section. Don't think the way calendar works had any effect on NF mafia. back then anyone could open a signup and host and the host maturely discuss among them who goes first when ready
yeah lmao
remember the calendar. i have to wait 2 years for my game LOL
then its even more beneficial for u to see the signup thread as early as possible to make such decisions
i think NF started dying when the OG players and hosts started leaving cuz of irl, then totally crumbled after mbxx wiped it. players just moved over here cuz its more active / younger player base. NF as a website is dying as a whole, not the mafia section. Don't think the way calendar works had any effect on NF mafia. back then anyone could open a signup and host and the host maturely discuss among them who goes first when ready
yeah lmao
remember the calendar. i have to wait 2 years for my game LOL
then its even more beneficial for u to see the signup thread as early as possible to make such decisions
@Dragomir i have a suggestion tbh
how about we don't worry about those who say: I want to host so and so game
and instead the queue is there and only there for those who are absolutely ready to start right now
basically, the order at which you said you want to host shouldnt matter. what matters is who is ready and who is not ready. if multiple are ready at the same time, then they can decide via a queue. the rest who are not ready dont matter. they are not part of the equation
some people take months, some take weeks etc.. to get their game ready and polished. i feel like we are putting way more emphasis on who said that they want to host, instead of who is ready to host
how about we don't worry about those who say: I want to host so and so game
and instead the queue is there and only there for those who are absolutely ready to start right now
basically, the order at which you said you want to host shouldnt matter. what matters is who is ready and who is not ready. if multiple are ready at the same time, then they can decide via a queue. the rest who are not ready dont matter. they are not part of the equation
some people take months, some take weeks etc.. to get their game ready and polished. i feel like we are putting way more emphasis on who said that they want to host, instead of who is ready to host
D
I like this idea, we can do that. Forces people to focus on getting their setup finished instead of trying to claim a spot.
Though, I don't think much would change in terms of current situation. Because Ratchet, me, Aries, Beky, and Flower are all ready. There's already an established queue of Ratchet, me, Aries, and Beky in that order. Flower's game is causing some issues here as she's trying to host her game before September.
Though, I don't think much would change in terms of current situation. Because Ratchet, me, Aries, Beky, and Flower are all ready. There's already an established queue of Ratchet, me, Aries, and Beky in that order. Flower's game is causing some issues here as she's trying to host her game before September.
D
July is completely booked and so is early August with Beky's game. @Flowa @SoulKiller it is up to you two to decide who hosts first. No idea how ready Ultra's game is so I won't include him in the equation yet.
- Status