Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1055 Spoilers Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #admirals>yonko #luffy bodies your fav #momo>kaido #momo>zoro #perona top 1 #shanks greatness #shanks is the best yonko #shanks top 1 #ulti is best girl #wtf #yamato4nakama #yonko>admirals akainu>aramaki carrot neg diffs aramaki kaido>greenbull kizaru>aramaki momo greatness shanks low diffs greenbull shanks>greenbull shanks>mihawk
- Status
Because Shanks obviously falls short of Roger, Rayleigh is the next best thing. Both are swordsman with all 3 haki confirmed.
And no Shanks getup is nearly identical to Rayleigh's all the way down to the sandals and hairy legs.
Both wear a button up shirt, with a cloak/cape ontop, trunks that stop around the shins, sandals. Heck they even have a scar over their eye as a bonus. It's actually scary how similar they look, to the point where Rayleigh could legit be Shanks aged 25 years.
And no Shanks getup is nearly identical to Rayleigh's all the way down to the sandals and hairy legs.
Both wear a button up shirt, with a cloak/cape ontop, trunks that stop around the shins, sandals. Heck they even have a scar over their eye as a bonus. It's actually scary how similar they look, to the point where Rayleigh could legit be Shanks aged 25 years.
Oda fucked up with Greenbull. This is gonna get a much larger discussion post after the chapter drops.
1)Greenbull wasn’t serious against Momo/Yamato/scabbards. This heavily implies that him and his full power are being saved for the later in the story, since we don’t get to see it here.
So he’s a future antagonist. I think this is super obvious and should not be debatable, even just based purely off the context of 1055 alone.
2) If Aramaki is a future antagonist/fight for the SHs, why is Oda embarrassing him? Story telling wise you never want your reader to feel like an antagonist is at an overwhelming disadvantage to the protagonists.
This is literally writing 101 stuff - I’m not talking shit here, in introductory courses you will always be told that antagonists should have leverage on the protagonist, power, political, or otherwise.
Oda is trying to have his cake and eat it too, set up Greenbull as a future antagonist yet also hype Momo and Shanks.
It’s just like… blatantly bad writing?
1)Greenbull wasn’t serious against Momo/Yamato/scabbards. This heavily implies that him and his full power are being saved for the later in the story, since we don’t get to see it here.
So he’s a future antagonist. I think this is super obvious and should not be debatable, even just based purely off the context of 1055 alone.
2) If Aramaki is a future antagonist/fight for the SHs, why is Oda embarrassing him? Story telling wise you never want your reader to feel like an antagonist is at an overwhelming disadvantage to the protagonists.
This is literally writing 101 stuff - I’m not talking shit here, in introductory courses you will always be told that antagonists should have leverage on the protagonist, power, political, or otherwise.
Oda is trying to have his cake and eat it too, set up Greenbull as a future antagonist yet also hype Momo and Shanks.
It’s just like… blatantly bad writing?
- Status