So then there are rules. Oda is following the rules of the settings that he created. You are literally proving my point. That is the whole point of my claim, that story telling has rules.
But rules don't dictate objectivity. Rules are subjective, otherwise, you don't have different rules for different games. Basically, rules can be evolved or modified. So it was never objective.
No it obviously isn't good writing. But you basically trash anything and everything Oda writes no matter what it is, so I feel like you need to learn what the right kind of subjectivity is. Or just go back to Naruto, since you love sucking Kishimoto's dick.
The fact that you even thought of rape shows how creepy and weird you are.
So then there is such thing as bad writing then? Which totally contradicts your earlier statement! Now you see my point? I used the rape analogy because I wanted to showcase something so absurd and clearly over the top that it is clearly bad writing which you guys claimed doesn't exist.
So then there is such thing as bad writing then? Which totally contradicts your earlier statement! Now you see my point? I used the rape analogy because I wanted to showcase something so absurd and clearly over the top that it is clearly bad writing which you guys claimed doesn't exist.
But rules don't dictate objectivity. Rules are subjective, otherwise, you don't have different rules for different games. Basically, rules can be evolved or modified. So it was never objective.
That isn't the argument. I agree rules can be changed and modified but there are still rules. They still exist. Story telling has rules. That is my point that you guys keep claiming doesn't exist.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.