You need Yonko level haki to negate LAW's hax.
You don't need that to negate preTS Kalifa's hax or Doc Q's hax.
Nope. DF hax is df hax for everyone unless they're using immense amounts of haki actively. If kaido wasn't using haki actively, Law would move him.

BB feared Boa turning him to stone. You think he would care if it didn't affect him?

Hax that affects a body, is out of the users control after it's done. The only way to negate that is to use immense haki like law did, or use it continuously like Kaido and BM.
 
Doesn't mean Law has stronger Haki for negating the ability of Chopper's opponent.
what are u slow? I already told u Someone with Zero Haki.

Better yet I’ll put it in legion terms so u can understand (usopp opponent sugar) was portrayed as capable of beating Law/Luffy through hax on DR. Zero indication was ever suggested the opponent lvl has any relevance. Legion made it up, hence the feat being attribute to a 3billion man, an never being implied possibly by non top tier….

Negating's Law's Hax is a MUCH better feat than negating the hax of Chopper's opponent.
Hope this helps.
No, only makes u seem dumber, since u already suggest Kimemon CoA> Law. There legit Zero indicates Law DF harder to counter then others. It’s all Haki related, u barely seem to grasp what ur arguing
:seriously:
 
Top