Status
Not open for further replies.
@LayerZ

See the post:


Troll Lizaru's statement isn't even specific on how ''young'' he was, and the guy was calling Hawkins ''scary'' :suresure:
both Sengoku and Kizaru have the same idea of "young WB" because there was no other "young WB" to them, schizo. WB was not known before his piracy, lmao

Both Sengoku and Kizaru refer to the same young WB, since they belong to the same organization with the same info
 
You know there's actually zero proof that Weevil just started out 2 years ago.
There's also zero proof the other way around.
Teach is again a special case. Hid himself, held back his power until the right opportunity presented itself.

Law & Weevil being Warlords with ~400 million frozen bounties is actually logical scaling but whatever...
No it actually isn't. You're saying that because you want it to be like that.

Law started his career at a far younger age whereas Weevil started at his prime. He doesn't need to work up the ladder like Law did.

Also. There's enough evidence to say that Weevil started out post WB's death. Marco would've noted that they heard about a strong pirate causing havoc claiming to be WB's son but he never did implying he started during the TS. Another thing, it only makes sense because Bakkin is after WB's heritage that she thinks he left post his death.
 
S

Sasaki Kojirō

Leanbull probably held the citizens hostage and forced Weevil to surrender
Does it mean that in addition to being in a numerical advantage as shown on the last page vs Edward Weevil, GB also tried other means? Given his nature, it is plausible for him to do this kind of thing, even without caring about the lives of citizens. We have seen him justify all his atrocities by saying it is in the name of justice. LMAOOOO

Even if it is in the name of justice, it is not correct because it violates the basic moral principles of respect for life and human dignity. Justice should be achieved through fair means, and not by causing unnecessary harm to innocent people. Furthermore, hurting innocent civilians can have long-term consequences, such as increasing hostility and violence, and may even be counterproductive to the ultimate goal of achieving justice (creating a cycle of hate that we are already familiar with the Naruto stuttering about this).
The admirals are only caricatures of villains.
 
Nop he used his swords because zoro was using a sword he even said it himself .

He fougth againts at least 80% King and queen in 2v1 .
If King was comparable to green bull they would have won .
But he nearly low diffed them we can only see a small cut on his leg.
So stop the cap GB low diff king in 1v1 even at 100% .
If King goal is to stall tought he cna alst a long time but King will not win this fight .
Admirals are at an other level we do not care about commanders anymore now that zoro and sanji smoked 2 .
It's still his weapon. He didn't use sword techniques and that changes things. His final attack for example. He was doing it with his sword.

%80? Come on. Didn't you see he was wrapped in bandages? Under normal circumstances, it is impossible for a commander to lose to an admiral so easily.

King is really strong. Goverment used his fire and wings for Seraphims. Admirals are not an other level, they are close to Yc1.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top