Controversial General Political Discussion

[Seatonnes]

We are neutral towards trans people , they were always openly treated with respect and normal being of the society.
Its gay which was never supported. That's like going against law of nature lmao.

Animals are gay
Why cant humans be gay?

 

[Cruxroux]

What do you mean?

I saw a lot Hindus saying there's no explicit text condemning Homosexuals, same with Buddhism.

This was constantly used during 2018 court debate against decriminalization of homosexuality


I

That's their personal agenda and they are using relegion as a medium to express their hate.
We got no issues with trans people.
But for gay yes. We are sort of against it.

 

[Toby D. Dog]

I dream of a world where if there’s two consenting adults that want to fuck each other’s brains out, they won’t have to worry about closeted and hateful weirdos being all up in their business.

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

I dream of a world were if there’s two consenting adults that want to fuck each other’s brains out, they won’t have to worry about closeted and hateful weirdos all up on their business.

 

[Cruxroux]

Animals are gay
Why cant humans be gay?

Well to put it briefly , I'm not going into too much details but opposites are supposed to attract for *creation* not the same.

 

[Seatonnes]

'Skill issue'

Holy....

Is that your Stockholm syndrome talking or.....?

No i just think its funny because its clear he has no disadvantage from being colonised due to being a “doctor” so he shouldnt be scapegoating colonisation half the time

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Also FYI Hindu is not limited to a single race. Anyone who follows Sanatana Dharma is a Hindu irrespective of Ethnicity, Origin, Color, Sexual Orientation

Yes, after you conquered that whole subcontinent everyone became Hindu huh?

 

[Cruxroux]

Yes, after you conquered that whole subcontinent everyone became Hindu huh?

Ignore him no Hindu planning on that shit.
Best will do is take Pakistan that's it.

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

That's their personal agenda and they are using relegion as a medium to express their hate.
We got no issues with trans people.
But for gay yes. We are sort of against it.

We are talking about Gays.


Why you're against it when there's plenty of Evidence that's Hindu Buddhism is neutral towards it?

 

[Cruxroux]

We are talking about Gays.


Why you're against it when there's plenty of of Evidence that's Hindu Buddhism is neutral towards it?

I don't know what evidence you're talking about.
But gays are like one of the few things which can be done wrong on this era according to a few Relegious scripts "PREDICTING" CURRENT ERA.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

@Seatonnes because of her family I know a lot of Indian people. Some of them are really sweet and not fascist lunatics like this idiot. There’s over a billion Indians in the world, most of them are not like him.

Look up Mahatma Gandhi's statements on black Africans.

Just saying

Some of those people are only against conquest and racism when they themselves are the victims.
Other than that, they love themswlves some Aryan supremacy

 

[Toby D. Dog]

Well to put it briefly , I'm not going into too much details but opposites are supposed to attract for *creation* not the same.

Why do you care tho, let others do what they want.

 

[Seatonnes]

Well to put it briefly , I'm not going into too much details but opposites are supposed to attract for *creation* not the same.

Why are males and females opposites

 

[Tejas]

Hindus are in danger?

Hindus are eighth-class citizens in their own country:



1) State control of Hindu temples and their properties: Secularism means total separation of state and religion but in Bharat only Mandirs(Hindu Temples) are controlled by the government. Mandirs have been centres of worship, learning, community living, trade & economy, statecraft, and even defence. Hence, invaders believed that to dismantle Bharat, its temple ecosystem had to be dismantled.
The British passed this trait to Brown Sahibs who are continuing to carry forward the British legacy since independence in the form of various regulations. Hindus have been at the receiving end of state-sponsored loot and pillaging of Mandirs due to these regulations. The Congress government passed the Hindu religious and charitable endowments Act 1959 to further snub Hindus when the draconian provisions of the Hindu religious and charitable endowments Act 1951 were challenged and struck down by the courts.

2) Injustice towards Kashmiri Hindus: “Terrorists are targeting Hindus settled in Kashmir and not tourists which is evident from the fact that this year has been the highest. They want Hindus to return as tourists and fill their coffers but not settle in their own land as Kashmiri Hindu”. State allows Rohingyas to settle across Bharat including Jammu & Kashmir but not Kashmiri Hindus. Kashmiri Hindus continue to live as refugees for more than three decades in ugly inhospitable transit camps.

The government, judiciary, and society forgetting what Islamist Jihadis uttered and did. The nation hears complaints through the barrel of a gun not the ink of a pen, it believes inaction is medicine, believes time heals, and believes wounds don’t fester.

3) Waqf Act of 1995: Waqf is the third largest land owner in India after defence and railways. Interestingly, much of its land holding is pre-independence and a result of the British placating Muslims. The insidious give-and-take between the British and Muslims resulted in Waqf Board being at the receiving end of British generosity.
The Congress government in keeping with its appeasement policy decided to withdraw its claim on 123 Prime Central Delhi properties and gifted them to Waqf Board on March 5, 2014. These were endowed to the government by the departing British and their status remained unchanged for 70 years. According to the Waqf Act, every donated land belongs to ‘Allah in perpetuity’ and it is the Waqf Board that decides which land is fit to be declared Waqf property which can be used for any ‘Sharia-compliant purpose’.


4) RTE (Right to Education) Act: The Congress-led UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government passed the RTE Act in 2009. The preamble of the Act states it aims to provide free and compulsory education to all children in the 6 to 14 years age group. RTE has and continues to destroy Hindu schools and institutions.
“Perhaps that is the overarching goal of secularism – to allow the prospering of every other religion, its belief systems, way of life, cultural values, educational methods, wisdom, books & scriptures except Hinduism”

There are numerous Provisions under the RTE that selectively apply only to non-minority schools. RTE’s order stating that 25 per cent of seats must be allotted to children belonging to economically weaker sections and other disadvantaged groups is proving to be a death knell for privately run Hindu educational institutions.


5) Legislations favouring non-Hindus & discriminating against Hindus: Bigamy is punishable under Section 494 of IPC (Indian Penal Code) but is permitted for Muslims under the Muslim Personal law Sharia application Act 1937, Communal violence bill (Prevention of communal and targeted violence access to justice and reparations Bill 2011) which fortunately didn’t translate into an Act, and 1952 Hindu court bill adopted in 1956 are some such legislations.


6) Judiciary that exclusively tries to reform only Hindu Dharma: several instances where the judiciary discriminated against the ‘majority’ such as in the Nupur Sharma and Sabarimala cases.


7) Celebrating those who killed and converted millions of Hindus: invaders have been glorified and honoured by naming cities, railway stations, and other places after them. Furthermore, leftist historians (read distortians) have whitewashed the crimes of these barbaric invaders and how this whitewashing has weakened Bharat.


8) Places of Worship Act 1991: this is the most barbaric legislation passed in Bharat. Supreme Court (SC) wilfully ratified this Act in its 2019 Ayodhya verdict. The Act obligates maintaining all religious places except Ram Janmabhoomi as they were on August 15, 1947. This makes it almost impossible to reclaim temples that have been encroached on by invaders.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Making up bullshit again

its a fact, in your culture, there is a reason why in a bunch of movies white women are shown for no reason (such as backup dancers)

They are not white, they're Indians who used face whitening cream.

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

Look up Mahatma Gandhi's statements on black Africans.

Just saying

Some of those people are only against conquest and racism when they themselves are the victims.
Other than that, they love themswlves some Aryan supremacy

He got his statues taken down in some countries due to that

 

[Cruxroux]

Why do you care tho, let others do what they want.

I don't.
I really don't care what people do.
I was just telling the scenario of India.

 

[Seatonnes]

Hindus are eighth-class citizens in their own country:



1) State control of Hindu temples and their properties: Secularism means total separation of state and religion but in Bharat only Mandirs(Hindu Temples) are controlled by the government. Mandirs have been centres of worship, learning, community living, trade & economy, statecraft, and even defence. Hence, invaders believed that to dismantle Bharat, its temple ecosystem had to be dismantled.
The British passed this trait to Brown Sahibs who are continuing to carry forward the British legacy since independence in the form of various regulations. Hindus have been at the receiving end of state-sponsored loot and pillaging of Mandirs due to these regulations. The Congress government passed the Hindu religious and charitable endowments Act 1959 to further snub Hindus when the draconian provisions of the Hindu religious and charitable endowments Act 1951 were challenged and struck down by the courts.

2) Injustice towards Kashmiri Hindus: “Terrorists are targeting Hindus settled in Kashmir and not tourists which is evident from the fact that this year has been the highest. They want Hindus to return as tourists and fill their coffers but not settle in their own land as Kashmiri Hindu”. State allows Rohingyas to settle across Bharat including Jammu & Kashmir but not Kashmiri Hindus. Kashmiri Hindus continue to live as refugees for more than three decades in ugly inhospitable transit camps.

The government, judiciary, and society forgetting what Islamist Jihadis uttered and did. The nation hears complaints through the barrel of a gun not the ink of a pen, it believes inaction is medicine, believes time heals, and believes wounds don’t fester.

3) Waqf Act of 1995: Waqf is the third largest land owner in India after defence and railways. Interestingly, much of its land holding is pre-independence and a result of the British placating Muslims. The insidious give-and-take between the British and Muslims resulted in Waqf Board being at the receiving end of British generosity.
The Congress government in keeping with its appeasement policy decided to withdraw its claim on 123 Prime Central Delhi properties and gifted them to Waqf Board on March 5, 2014. These were endowed to the government by the departing British and their status remained unchanged for 70 years. According to the Waqf Act, every donated land belongs to ‘Allah in perpetuity’ and it is the Waqf Board that decides which land is fit to be declared Waqf property which can be used for any ‘Sharia-compliant purpose’.


4) RTE (Right to Education) Act: The Congress-led UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government passed the RTE Act in 2009. The preamble of the Act states it aims to provide free and compulsory education to all children in the 6 to 14 years age group. RTE has and continues to destroy Hindu schools and institutions.
“Perhaps that is the overarching goal of secularism – to allow the prospering of every other religion, its belief systems, way of life, cultural values, educational methods, wisdom, books & scriptures except Hinduism”

There are numerous Provisions under the RTE that selectively apply only to non-minority schools. RTE’s order stating that 25 per cent of seats must be allotted to children belonging to economically weaker sections and other disadvantaged groups is proving to be a death knell for privately run Hindu educational institutions.


5) Legislations favouring non-Hindus & discriminating against Hindus: Bigamy is punishable under Section 494 of IPC (Indian Penal Code) but is permitted for Muslims under the Muslim Personal law Sharia application Act 1937, Communal violence bill (Prevention of communal and targeted violence access to justice and reparations Bill 2011) which fortunately didn’t translate into an Act, and 1952 Hindu court bill adopted in 1956 are some such legislations.


6) Judiciary that exclusively tries to reform only Hindu Dharma: several instances where the judiciary discriminated against the ‘majority’ such as in the Nupur Sharma and Sabarimala cases.


7) Celebrating those who killed and converted millions of Hindus: invaders have been glorified and honoured by naming cities, railway stations, and other places after them. Furthermore, leftist historians (read distortians) have whitewashed the crimes of these barbaric invaders and how this whitewashing has weakened Bharat.


8) Places of Worship Act 1991: this is the most barbaric legislation passed in Bharat. Supreme Court (SC) wilfully ratified this Act in its 2019 Ayodhya verdict. The Act obligates maintaining all religious places except Ram Janmabhoomi as they were on August 15, 1947. This makes it almost impossible to reclaim temples that have been encroached on by invaders.

Write something unique for once, stop being a sheep at another herd
https://hindupost.in/society-culture/hindus-eighth-class-in-own-country/

 

[Cruxroux]

Hindus are eighth-class citizens in their own country:



1) State control of Hindu temples and their properties: Secularism means total separation of state and religion but in Bharat only Mandirs(Hindu Temples) are controlled by the government. Mandirs have been centres of worship, learning, community living, trade & economy, statecraft, and even defence. Hence, invaders believed that to dismantle Bharat, its temple ecosystem had to be dismantled.
The British passed this trait to Brown Sahibs who are continuing to carry forward the British legacy since independence in the form of various regulations. Hindus have been at the receiving end of state-sponsored loot and pillaging of Mandirs due to these regulations. The Congress government passed the Hindu religious and charitable endowments Act 1959 to further snub Hindus when the draconian provisions of the Hindu religious and charitable endowments Act 1951 were challenged and struck down by the courts.

2) Injustice towards Kashmiri Hindus: “Terrorists are targeting Hindus settled in Kashmir and not tourists which is evident from the fact that this year has been the highest. They want Hindus to return as tourists and fill their coffers but not settle in their own land as Kashmiri Hindu”. State allows Rohingyas to settle across Bharat including Jammu & Kashmir but not Kashmiri Hindus. Kashmiri Hindus continue to live as refugees for more than three decades in ugly inhospitable transit camps.

The government, judiciary, and society forgetting what Islamist Jihadis uttered and did. The nation hears complaints through the barrel of a gun not the ink of a pen, it believes inaction is medicine, believes time heals, and believes wounds don’t fester.

3) Waqf Act of 1995: Waqf is the third largest land owner in India after defence and railways. Interestingly, much of its land holding is pre-independence and a result of the British placating Muslims. The insidious give-and-take between the British and Muslims resulted in Waqf Board being at the receiving end of British generosity.
The Congress government in keeping with its appeasement policy decided to withdraw its claim on 123 Prime Central Delhi properties and gifted them to Waqf Board on March 5, 2014. These were endowed to the government by the departing British and their status remained unchanged for 70 years. According to the Waqf Act, every donated land belongs to ‘Allah in perpetuity’ and it is the Waqf Board that decides which land is fit to be declared Waqf property which can be used for any ‘Sharia-compliant purpose’.


4) RTE (Right to Education) Act: The Congress-led UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government passed the RTE Act in 2009. The preamble of the Act states it aims to provide free and compulsory education to all children in the 6 to 14 years age group. RTE has and continues to destroy Hindu schools and institutions.
“Perhaps that is the overarching goal of secularism – to allow the prospering of every other religion, its belief systems, way of life, cultural values, educational methods, wisdom, books & scriptures except Hinduism”

There are numerous Provisions under the RTE that selectively apply only to non-minority schools. RTE’s order stating that 25 per cent of seats must be allotted to children belonging to economically weaker sections and other disadvantaged groups is proving to be a death knell for privately run Hindu educational institutions.


5) Legislations favouring non-Hindus & discriminating against Hindus: Bigamy is punishable under Section 494 of IPC (Indian Penal Code) but is permitted for Muslims under the Muslim Personal law Sharia application Act 1937, Communal violence bill (Prevention of communal and targeted violence access to justice and reparations Bill 2011) which fortunately didn’t translate into an Act, and 1952 Hindu court bill adopted in 1956 are some such legislations.


6) Judiciary that exclusively tries to reform only Hindu Dharma: several instances where the judiciary discriminated against the ‘majority’ such as in the Nupur Sharma and Sabarimala cases.


7) Celebrating those who killed and converted millions of Hindus: invaders have been glorified and honoured by naming cities, railway stations, and other places after them. Furthermore, leftist historians (read distortians) have whitewashed the crimes of these barbaric invaders and how this whitewashing has weakened Bharat.


8) Places of Worship Act 1991: this is the most barbaric legislation passed in Bharat. Supreme Court (SC) wilfully ratified this Act in its 2019 Ayodhya verdict. The Act obligates maintaining all religious places except Ram Janmabhoomi as they were on August 15, 1947. This makes it almost impossible to reclaim temples that have been encroached on by invaders.

I'm not reading that.
And dude get a life.
There better jobs to do than defending your relegion.

Post automatically merged: Mar 7, 2023

Why are males and females opposites

Why are we getting into philosophical shit

 

[K!NG HARA$H!MA]

Look up Mahatma Gandhi's statements on black Africans.

Just saying

Some of those people are only against conquest and racism when they themselves are the victims.
Other than that, they love themswlves some Aryan supremacy

Truth is, everyone wants to be Aryans and some sort of Chosen Race