Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1083 Spoilers Discussion

Which Holy knight is your fav ?


  • Total voters
    37
Status
Not open for further replies.
You just owned the entire Latrine fandom.
And with pleasure, I hate tards of any kind, but the most irritating ones are the hypocrite ones like Admiral stans.

Nerfed Yamato did better vs Acoa Luffy post Udon than nerfed Greenbum did vs Morley.

Plus Admiral stans keep ignoring fact that Greenbull in his tree form did no damage to Momo.

They say Yamato did not hurt Greenbull even tho Greenbull himself confirms her haki is strong and made him complain of pain.

Greenbull in his tree form couldn't even make Momo complain of pain, but Admiral stans don't see that.
 
Your way of interpretation of the word saved makes it sound as if she thinks that Greenbull can beat Everyone in wano if Shanks didn't interfere. Which is Cap.
Learn English, saved can be used for other context and interpretation and way of talking, "You saved me from doing that, Saved me some time, Saved from that thing to happen" you can use the word save for anything even for small things are avoidable, Greenbull said he would try murder civilians just to try reach Luffy, Shanks interference saved from bad things to happen even when is garanteed Greenbull would lost he could still do some damage to Wano, nowhere said he could beat her if Shanks didn't interfere. etc etc.

Nothing says Greenbull can beat her, he have inferior feats than her, if he was stronger than her he would at least do some damage to Fat Giant ass Morley.

Yamato was in a 1 v 1 against Hybrid kaido and didn't loose.
That literally what i think, read what i try to tell y'all :suresure:;


"Saved the country" is not a minor thing, in fact in that sentence Yamato literally "Keep safe from danger the country" (atleast, if you ok with that lol)

Do Aramaki killing civilians is a danger for the country in Yamato pov ? Yeah or atleast that what I think
Would she be able to protect the civilians ? Atleast with how she talk she can't because she literally say the haki SAVED THEM.

I do not think Aramaki would be able to kill everyone, but killing civilans is already a danger for wano.
 
And with pleasure, I hate tards of any kind, but the most irritating ones are the hypocrite ones like Admiral stans.

Nerfed Yamato did better vs Acoa Luffy post Udon than nerfed Greenbum did vs Morley.

Plus Admiral stans keep ignoring fact that Greenbull in his tree form did no damage to Momo.

They say Yamato did not hurt Greenbull even tho Greenbull himself confirms her haki is strong and made him complain of pain.

Greenbull in his tree form couldn't even make Momo complain of pain, but Admiral stans don't see that.
Screw the Ladmirals
 
Zoro & Luffy have both
I find it hard to correlate the adv CoA moves luffy learned to zoro's haki usage in any way.
Yes, the way granpa described adv CoA was very much the same thing Koshiro told zoro back in the day but zoro still haven't shown any internal destruction or something. The events with Lucci and their cuffs have been a good opportunity but unfortunately Oda chose otherwise
 
That literally what i think, read what i try to tell y'all :suresure:;


"Saved the country" is not a minor thing, in fact in that sentence Yamato literally "Keep safe from danger the country" (atleast, if you ok with that lol)

Do Aramaki killing civilians is a danger for the country in Yamato pov ? Yeah or atleast that what I think
Would she be able to protect the civilians ? Atleast with how she talk she can't because she literally say the haki SAVED THEM.

I do not think Aramaki would be able to kill everyone, but killing civilans is already a danger for wano.
The civilians are part of the country, the country is the civilians, killing civilian's is a big deal, Yamato didn't want anything of what he said to happen and that includes him killing civilian's, Shanks interference just saved from the bare minimum that is destruction or death of civilian's.

If you don't think he can kill everyone so why are you using this argument of " Saved" only against her to say he can beat her but not everyone else??

Even tho Greenbull doesn't have any feat says he is stronger than Yamato just like he doesn't have any feat says he is stronger than luffy. So be impartial.
 
Thats just some asscannon. Unless they are good double agents, the story doesn't match what the rumors are saying.
To be honest it's all asscannon at this moment.

We have no idea who any of these are.

I kind of hope we get some pre existing characters as these Holy Knights I feel like adding 9 completely new Yonko Level fighters would break the entire purpose for why the WG had warlords in the first place.
 
I think they are Tobiroppo of the final war.
Imu == Kaido
Gorosei == Calamities
Holy knights == Tobiroppo
they still have Seraphims and maybe other powerfull soldiers, but I think some Seraphims if not all of them will betray the WG and ally with Luffy
Imu
Goroseis
Kong
Holy Guard
CP0 (Gismonda, Joseph, maybe Guernica)
Seraphins
Admirals
Vice Admirals

If oda gives a match up for each one he is crazy
 
The civilians are part of the country, the country is the civilians, killing civilian's is a big deal, Yamato didn't want anything of what he said to happen and that includes him killing civilian's, Shanks interference just saved from the bare minimum that is destruction or death of civilian's.

If you don't think he can kill everyone so why are you using this argument of " Saved" only against her to say he can beat her but not everyone else??

Even tho Greenbull doesn't have any feat says he is stronger than Yamato just like he doesn't have any feat says he is stronger than luffy. So be impartial.
She literally say "The haki keep the admiral at bay and saved the country", "Keep an Admiral at bay" was used by someone else before that and that Kizaru with Rayleigh, that literally mean stopping the admiral from doing what they want to do, block him.

If she was even able to do so on Aramaki , why do she used the WORD SAVED, Shanks literally SAVED wano country because civilians would get KILLED

And bro like i said, she showed better not everyone is a character saved for the end of the manga/full whole arc as antagonist for a wing of the next pirate king :suresure::suresure:
 
Yamato isn't non acoc or Acoa Luffy, Yamato scales close to Luffy with Acoc, she was in a 1 v 1 and matching to Acoc Hybrid Kaido, just Base kaido with acoc low diffs King, Hybrid kaido couldn't low diff Yamato and she didn't even loose and lasted longer than Acoc Luffy from 1010, she is stronger than that Luffy of that chapter who is stronger than King by a lot. She is destroying King
Yamato acknowledge she was fighting a losing battle and was eventually going to lose. Zoro with 20 to 30 broken bones beat and scarred Kaido in battle. He damaged Kaido more than Yamato did. She doesn't have Zoro's AP or powerful cutting power.

Kaido is not low diff King. King is more durable and harder to damage than Kaido. Part of the reason Oda had Zoro fight Kaido first was to give us a comparison between the two.

Cutting attacks are the best type of attacks for dealing with characters with high durability because cutting attacks cuts through durability and burns through endurance very quickly.

Not even Kaido possess Zoro powerful cutting power. His wind blades are much weaken than Zoro's attacks.

Kaido and Yamato would require more attacks to bring down King than Zoro. If Kaido's attacks were as deadly as Zoro's he would have quickly defeated Luffy.

There's a reason we never see characters take multiple powerful cutting attacks.
 
She literally say "The haki keep the admiral at bay and saved the country", "Keep an Admiral at bay" was used by someone else before that and that Kizaru with Rayleigh, that literally mean stopping the admiral from doing what they want to do, block him.

If she was even able to do so on Aramaki , why do she used the WORD SAVED, Shanks literally SAVED wano country because civilians would get KILLED

And bro like i said, she showed better not everyone is a character saved for the end of the manga/full whole arc as antagonist for a wing of the next pirate king :suresure::suresure:
If she wasn't capable, why she stayed in Wano without Luffy or any Strawhat?? She stayed Because she can beat at least Greenbull and stayed to protect Wano to let Strawhats feel better and they know Wano is safe until Momo can protect it.

You are twisting and avoiding the context of what she was trying to say and being a hypocrite.

You are only using this argument to donwplay her but not to donwplay Luffy or say Greenbull can beat Luffy if he specifically fought Luffy from the start.

When Luffy comes into the conversation you avoid and forget about him, because Luffy existence destroys your headcanon.

Say aswell that Greenbull can beat Luffy and try prove it.
 
I find it hard to correlate the adv CoA moves luffy learned to zoro's haki usage in any way.
Yes, the way granpa described adv CoA was very much the same thing Koshiro told zoro back in the day but zoro still haven't shown any internal destruction or something. The events with Lucci and their cuffs have been a good opportunity but unfortunately Oda chose otherwise
Zoro is ADVCOA specialist, i don't like to use anime but when its glowing with that stupid aura stuff it's ADVCOA. Luffy Rayleigh hyogoro some 9 scabards & zoro use it. Kaido Yamato King don't have it.
Kaido yamato have ADVCOC not ADVCOA
 
Yamato acknowledge she was fighting a losing battle and was eventually going to lose. Zoro with 20 to 30 broken bones beat and scarred Kaido in battle. He damaged Kaido more than Yamato did. She doesn't have Zoro's AP or powerful cutting power.

Kaido is not low diff King. King is more durable and harder to damage than Kaido. Part of the reason Oda had Zoro fight Kaido first was to give us a comparison between the two.

Cutting attacks are the best type of attacks for dealing with characters with high durability because cutting attacks cuts through durability and burns through endurance very quickly.

Not even Kaido possess Zoro powerful cutting power. His wind blades are much weaken than Zoro's attacks.

Kaido and Yamato would require more attacks to bring down King than Zoro. If Kaido's attacks were as deadly as Zoro's he would have quickly defeated Luffy.

There's a reason we never see characters take multiple powerful cutting attacks.
Zoro with no broken when not getting helped by Enma was equally trading blows with X-Drake and Aloo, Yamato even nerfed when in Base form could do what Ashura, Zoro strongest attack at Rooftop did, she in base did block Hybrid Kaido.

King of hell Zoro is not rooftop Zoro is a stronger and healed Zoro since he took Mink drug.

Luffy from 1010 is stronger than that Zoro, she is stronger than that Luffy since she didn't loose and lasted longer vs Kaido, King getting destroyed by Base kaido or that Luffy, Yamato 1 v 1 Acoc Hybrid Kaido. That's far more complicated then fighting King or fighting King of hell Zoro, she is above those two, and a mere Zoro fanboy ain't changing that fact independent how much you cry about it.
 
Neither does Kaido have ACoa, and still he did beat a Luffy is stronger than King or Zoro, Acoc Luffy 1010 >>> King or Zoro.

Yamato lasted longer than that Luffy, 1 v 1 Acoc Hybrid Kaido, Kaido who just in Base is Destroying King in low diff.
Why you use pre Zoro power up, that's disingenuous, when he awakens ADVCOC he finishes King quickly, a Character known for durability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top