The relevance of this witness is certainly questionable at best!
How does the jury feel about the witness @Doflamingo TAC curse? and the following arguments?
How does the jury feel about the witness @Doflamingo TAC curse? and the following arguments?
Yes honor there is a reason why I ask these questions. Since when this trial start honor?
Days ago right? And since when a stranger can jump in the middle of a trial and claim that he want to defend someone? We don't know anything about TAC, why he is defending @ThatGuy , who is TAC and what is his goal? This trial became to big that people who been dead(@ThatWife ) comeback, this trial has a big meaning and we can't allow strange to enter this trial without knowing anything about that person. We should at least look at TAC before this trial became a mess up!!
Days ago right? And since when a stranger can jump in the middle of a trial and claim that he want to defend someone? We don't know anything about TAC, why he is defending @ThatGuy , who is TAC and what is his goal? This trial became to big that people who been dead(@ThatWife ) comeback, this trial has a big meaning and we can't allow strange to enter this trial without knowing anything about that person. We should at least look at TAC before this trial became a mess up!!
None of this is relevant to the trial.
the trial is Thatguy, not TAC. This is malpractice of the highest levels and bares not the slightest relevance, unless we’re opening up witnesses to discredit court officials like lawyers, baliffs, judges, etc. which is not a practice I’d recommend
the trial is Thatguy, not TAC. This is malpractice of the highest levels and bares not the slightest relevance, unless we’re opening up witnesses to discredit court officials like lawyers, baliffs, judges, etc. which is not a practice I’d recommend