please stop the psychophobia
Yes but in that case I'll make an exception, it would be crazy in the linguistic usage of the term.


No lol

What? Frogs? What trial? Care to explain?
Nop. Search animal necrophilia on google.


dude,c4n,cant distinguish male from female
?
Sexual reproducers have sex organs.

Asexual reproducers have other means, like spores.
Yeah, read science, its better than TV.
 
And humans drink alcohol .same thing.
Humans are different from all animals,although we share some similarities with a few.We are unique.Animals cant be used as standard to measure human behavior.
Post automatically merged:

Yes but in that case I'll make an exception, it would be crazy in the linguistic usage of the term.



No lol


Nop. Search animal necrophilia on google.



?

Yeah, read science, its better than TV.
natgeo is science in documentary form.stupid statement.
 
It is. I have no cure for your delusions.
Nop. Search animal necrophilia on google.
Why should I? I know what it is. But, since animals do homosexual activity, it is considered natural for humans. Why not for necrophilia, eating poop, and cannibalism?
Yeah, read science, its better than TV.
Read science more than you. Want to show your degrees here? Lets do it.
 
Something being natural is in no way a justification for humans to adopt the behavior.
Natural is a relative concept.What is natural for some species is not for others.Humans are very different from animals in general,therefore we can't use them as a standard for comparison.We need to judge each other by what the vast of majority of people have historically done.
 
ever heard of Kuru disease?its gods way of punishing cannibalism.Look it up.
It is now widely accepted that kuru was transmitted among members of the Fore tribe of Papua New Guinea via funerary cannibalism. Deceased family members were traditionally cooked and eaten, which was thought to help free the spirit of the dead.[4] Women and children usually consumed the brain, the organ in which infectious prions were most concentrated, thus allowing for transmission of kuru. The disease was therefore more prevalent among women and children
Clearly shows the dangers of sexism and ageism.
Post automatically merged:

There are two types of reproduction: sexual and asexual.

Sexual reproducers have sex organs.

Asexual reproducers have other means, like spores.
2 posts earlier you said the world is binary
 
Humans are different from all animals,although we share some similarities with a few.We are unique.Animals cant be used as standard to measure human behavior.
Yes they can, WTF.. We are not that special. Stop with this fallacious belief.
natgeo is science in documentary form.stupid statement.
Oh dear..


It is. I have no cure for your delusions.
Give me a scientific paper explaining that please (peer reviewed of course)


Why should I? I know what it is. But, since animals do homosexual activity, it is considered natural for humans. Why not for necrophilia, eating poop, and cannibalism?
THen you should know that frogs do that. I was just showing how absurd your argument was.


Read science more than you. Want to show your degrees here? Lets do it.
And still you quote TV..
 
The problem is that your sentence is a non sence, if you want a definition of "man" and "woman" then you are asking for a definition of GENDER.


I just let one afternoon pass, I was watching a stream today.
No. Give me the definition of "man" thats is BASED on gender as opposed to being based on sex, imem an adult humal male...

This makes perfect sense
 
Why? Animals do all of that, why are you picking just homosexuality? Your reasoning?

What is natural in terms of "using sex organs"? Please explain.

From my understanding, using sex organs for their intended purpose is natural (i.e., reproduction).
And using them for something else than reroduction is also natural, as evident by n a t u r e
 
Top