Controversial General Political Discussion

[Logiko]

dude if you nationalist and rockstar for Roo you become fascists, simple as that, becouese he doesnt know what ultranationalist and nationalist even means

You didn't understand a single thing he was saying. Simply because you are looking only to one half of the argument.

Did he tell you that being nationalistic made you a fascist ? No. He told you that ultranationalism was - COMBINED with other traits - a characteristic of fascist !

Read THIS:

https://www.faena.com/aleph/umberto-eco-a-practical-list-for-identifying-fascists

 

[Zolo]

You didn't understand a single thing he was saying. Simply because you are looking only to one half of the argument.

Did he tell you that being nationalistic made you a fascist ? No. He told you that ultranationalism was - COMBINED with other traits - a characteristic of fascist !

Read THIS:

https://www.faena.com/aleph/umberto-eco-a-practical-list-for-identifying-fascists

no you are wrong he actually said that trump is nationalist and not ultranationalist... I asked him if he wants to change hes argument, he did not respond,,.. so go to sleep carrot

 

[Roo]

Dude,plz prove Trump actually wanted to usurp shit. You said he said stuff about the constitution. plz link it.I'm genuinely curious.

lol there’s a bunch of his staffers admitting he wanted to change the election results. That’s is usurping Biden.

And here he is saying he never swore to support constitution
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...-oath-to-support-the-constitution/ar-AA1kFhDY

 

[Zolo]

lol there’s a bunch of his staffers admitting he wanted to change the election results. That’s is usurping Biden.

And here he is saying he never swore to support constitution
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...-oath-to-support-the-constitution/ar-AA1kFhDY

oh so this absolutely factual news wants me to pay for them ... so bad.... I wont. I will continue to believe whatever I hear person says for real

 

[Logiko]

trump is nationalist and not ultranationalist

Simply because he didn't get into detail, but Trump is an ultranationalist.

 

[Zolo]

Simply because he didn't get into detail, but Trump is an ultranationalist.

and you are far left extremist

 

[Logiko]

and you are far left extremist

Lol, I'm not even that radical.

 

[Zolo]

Lol, I'm not even that radical.

damn if you think what you say aint radical I dont even want to know what your ceiling is

 

[Bob74h]

Still not a liberal :)

Are you a classical liberal no


are you a progressive liberal yes


dude you dont even understand politics


Liberal aint just one stance anymore, ever since lefties adopted the term liberal

it now has two contexts, the classical one and the more leftist one


plenty of people as left leaning as you call themselves liberal, What makes them different


aside from motive, which you never even proven




And tbh carrot, I only ever refer to progressive liberals when calling you a liberal


cause you just dont align with the pro freedom and lower state authority positions held by classical liberals

I'm starting to think you like fascists...

literally means nothing other then guys you dislike



Yea, I like guys you dislike cause im not on your side


Am, i going to a aryan supremacy party probably not but most people are just by logic you propose fascists


I prefer kinda politically neutral people but im to hate leftists cause they are retarded as shit

 

[NAMELESS]

lol there’s a bunch of his staffers admitting he wanted to change the election results. That’s is usurping Biden.

And here he is saying he never swore to support constitution
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...-oath-to-support-the-constitution/ar-AA1kFhDY

Ok,this is a report.Where is the actual footage of him saying that?Video said his lawyers came up with such argument and the "he swore to preserve it".
MSN is buggy for me,video is too slow to load.Shitty site.
[automerge]1703179583[/automerge]

lol there’s a bunch of his staffers admitting he wanted to change the election results. That’s is usurping Biden.

And here he is saying he never swore to support constitution
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...-oath-to-support-the-constitution/ar-AA1kFhDY

What other people say don't matter,backstabbers are everywhere in politics.

 

[Zolo]

Ok,this is a report.Where is the actual footage of him saying that?Video said his lawyers came up with such argument and the "he swore to preserve it".
MSN is buggy for me,video is too slow to load.Shitty site.
[automerge]1703179583[/automerge]

What other people say don't matter,backstabbers are everywhere in politics.

Dude I dunno how about you but it asks me to pay money to read it.... so it must be fact ?

 

[NAMELESS]

Dude I dunno how about you but it asks me to pay money to read it.... so it must be fact ?

It didn't ask me anything,but the site was slow as fuck.Took forever to load a 51 seconds clip.I didn't even know msn still existed.I used the msn chat back when i was a kid lol

 

[Bob74h]

Lol, I'm not even that radical.

you literally advocate beating up people whom you politically oppose


your the most radical dude in here

 

[Zolo]

I didn't ask me anything,but the site was slow as fuck.Took forever to load a 51 seconds clip.I din't even know msn still existed.I used the msn chat back when i was a kid lol

being so negged by hes own arguments , geez

 

[ArturCantSpeakJapanese]

lol there’s a bunch of his staffers admitting he wanted to change the election results. That’s is usurping Biden.

And here he is saying he never swore to support constitution
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...-oath-to-support-the-constitution/ar-AA1kFhDY

this doesnt seem correct. also the legal argument there is pretty strong, not only does it not apply to the president, they would have to convict on insurrection which hasnt been done. you cant just say "anyone accused of this cant run for office", you need the law to function all the way around

 

[Zolo]

this doesnt seem correct. also the legal argument there is pretty strong, not only does it not apply to the president, they would have to convict on insurrection which hasnt been done. you cant just say "anyone accused of this cant run for office", you need the law to function all the way around

I wouldnt be surprised roo is the dude in hes avatar allways confused but allways sure he knows best

 

[Logiko]

damn if you think what you say aint radical I dont even want to know what your ceiling is

Trust me, the radical left is far more radical than me. I told you, I'm an entry leftist.

You have been blindly lead to believe the left was the Liberals where in fact we completely disagree with them. This is why we are saying that the overton windows moved right. That's why today you have arguments of the far right, simply because you have been lead to believe those arguments were legitimate and not radical where they are in fact just horrendus and dangerous for the people.

Your sin is that you are gullible.

Are you a classical liberal no


are you a progressive liberal yes

Still no. The left disagree with progressive liberal. Again, you are showing your ignorance and unwillingness to understand the political matter you are talking about.

Yea, I like guys you dislike cause im not on your side

You are making my point for me here... Which means that while I was calling you a simple confusionnist until now, I will start to call you a farrightist if you like people like Ben Shapiro or Matt walsh so much..

I prefer kinda politically neutral people but im to hate leftists cause they are retarded as shit

Politically neutral people are rightists. There is no such thing as politicaly neutral.

you literally advocate beating up people whom you politically oppose

Wrong, again a lie and an invention. I advocate for violence against those who deserve it if necessary. We are politically opposed still, I'm not advocating for physical violence against you, no ?

So stop inventing stuff mate, you are ridiculus.

 

[NAMELESS]

being so negged by hes own arguments , geez

Basically,Trump's Lawyers didn't say word for word that Trump "supports" the constitution and idiots are spinning it as if he wanted go full outlaw because of it.Childish propaganda.
[automerge]1703180109[/automerge]

this doesnt seem correct. also the legal argument there is pretty strong, not only does it not apply to the president, they would have to convict on insurrection which hasnt been done. you cant just say "anyone accused of this cant run for office", you need the law to function all the way around

They are fucking with semantics to make him look bad.Its bad propaganda for people that don't pay attention to whats going on.

 

[Zolo]

Basically,Trump's Lawyers didn't say word for word that Trump "supports" the constitution and idiots are spinning it as if he wanted go full outlaw because of it.Childish propaganda.
[automerge]1703180109[/automerge]

They are fucking with semantics to make him look bad.Its bad propaganda for people that don't pay attention to whats going on.

If they supported democracy they would be against him being erased from ballots.

 

[NAMELESS]

Trust me, the radical left is far more radical than me. I told you, I'm an entry leftist.

You have been blindly lead to believe the left was the Liberals where in fact we completely disagree with them. This is why we are saying that the overton windows moved right. That's why today you have arguments of the far right, simply because you have been lead to believe those arguments were legitimate and not radical where they are in fact just horrendus and dangerous for the people.

Your sin is that you are gullible.



Still no. The left disagree with progressive liberal. Again, you are showing your ignorance and unwillingness to understand the political matter you are talking about.



You are making my point for me here... Which means that while I was calling you a simple confusionnist until now, I will start to call you a farrightist if you like people like Ben Shapiro or Matt walsh so much..



Politically neutral people are rightists. There is no such thing as politicaly neutral.


Wrong, again a lie and an invention. I advocate for violence against those who deserve it if necessary. We are politically opposed still, I'm not advocating for physical violence against you, no ?

So stop inventing stuff mate, you are ridiculus.

omg...look who is calling people gullible