What you might think is a tear-track is just his cheekbone, and Oda doesn't draw tear trails like bruises
Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1104 Spoilers Discussion
- Thread starter Absalom
- Start date
- Status
You can't compare Oda art from 2005 with his current art. The dialogue "Your heart can't withstand doing this much longer" and "I should have brought darker sunglasses" makes it obvious that he's crying.
If you don't mind me pointing out,
I think you have misunderstood him saying "good characterization" for " morally good charcter"
You can have a objectively morally good charcter that is not characterised properly ye?
I believe his point of subjectivity is that the understanding of the characterization of any charcter is perceived through a subjective lense which is valid as many would, while understanding that kuma is a morally good character as per the objective portrayal , would have mixed feelings about the choices the author made for him to portray that said GOOD MAN portrayal.
On a personal note no matter the means the charcter is portrayed I take them for what they are and perceive it from an idealistic lense where i'd try to grasp kuma's sentiments in his miseries. Regardless of how excruciatingly painful it can be, for others for instance , they could deem it imperceptible or even conveniently too much . If you get what I mean.
I think you have misunderstood him saying "good characterization" for " morally good charcter"
You can have a objectively morally good charcter that is not characterised properly ye?
I believe his point of subjectivity is that the understanding of the characterization of any charcter is perceived through a subjective lense which is valid as many would, while understanding that kuma is a morally good character as per the objective portrayal , would have mixed feelings about the choices the author made for him to portray that said GOOD MAN portrayal.
On a personal note no matter the means the charcter is portrayed I take them for what they are and perceive it from an idealistic lense where i'd try to grasp kuma's sentiments in his miseries. Regardless of how excruciatingly painful it can be, for others for instance , they could deem it imperceptible or even conveniently too much . If you get what I mean.
Last edited:
"Concession accepted" - person who has 0 arguments that the author created and then abandoned a brain dead fan theory
Funnily enough, most of you Grassmaster Temple worshippers have that line ready to go 24/7 regardless of the argument you are losing.
You, pictured and colorozed:
Funnily enough, most of you Grassmaster Temple worshippers have that line ready to go 24/7 regardless of the argument you are losing.
You, pictured and colorozed:
"Concession accepted" - person who has 0 arguments that the author created and then abandoned a brain dead fan theory
Funnily enough, most of you Grassmaster Temple worshippers have that line ready to go 24/7 regardless of the argument you are losing.
You, pictured and colorozed:
Funnily enough, most of you Grassmaster Temple worshippers have that line ready to go 24/7 regardless of the argument you are losing.
You, pictured and colorozed:
So many people are misunderstanding Kizaru’s conflict.
Kizaru wants the SHs to escape with Vegapunk, but he’s not just going to throw away his duty like kuzan did. He showed from the start that he was willing to kill Vegapunk.
That is why Luffy vs Kizaru has to happen. If Kizaru betrays Saturn, he will be committing treason and he will probably get hunted by the remaining admirals/gorosei/holy knights. But if kizaru is defeated by Luffy, then vegapunk gets to escape and Kizaru doesn’t get branded a traitor.
It’s literally WCI 2.0. Saturn is the main villain, but Kizaru is Luffy’s 1v1. Saturn, like BM, has pretty mid offense(by top tier standards), but is insanely tough to take out.
Kizaru wants the SHs to escape with Vegapunk, but he’s not just going to throw away his duty like kuzan did. He showed from the start that he was willing to kill Vegapunk.
That is why Luffy vs Kizaru has to happen. If Kizaru betrays Saturn, he will be committing treason and he will probably get hunted by the remaining admirals/gorosei/holy knights. But if kizaru is defeated by Luffy, then vegapunk gets to escape and Kizaru doesn’t get branded a traitor.
It’s literally WCI 2.0. Saturn is the main villain, but Kizaru is Luffy’s 1v1. Saturn, like BM, has pretty mid offense(by top tier standards), but is insanely tough to take out.
Okay. If it is purely subjective, then give reasoning as to why Thanos getting arrested by regular human police should of happened. Although these things can't be found within he natural world without human creation, there are still standards that come into play within said creations, which is why stick figure drawings simply isn't as impressive as nearly life-like depiction of humans, or why the speed and racing accolades of Usain Bolt are impressive achievements despite there being no such standards as no one has achieved what he did as there are objective traits Usain Bolt has that no one else possesses, whereas there is little to no recognition of whoever's the slowest as it's simply isn't as spectacular given that pretty much anyone can move as slow as possible. Otherwise with your viewpoint argumentation holds no value as that's also subjective beliefs, and argumentive "fallacies" aren't really fallacies, but simply one's belief of which data point is more important.
- Status