Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Bless my parents, who had to raise me.
This isn't "non convenient truth". Its more complicated than that. In reality the advantage of transwomen (because we don't talk about the fact that transmen actually perform very well....) can only be seen in very few disciplines.
Meaning that there is absolutely no reason to have a complete ban of trans from competing in the same gender. In reality, the solution should be more inclusive and in a case by case basis.
https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/four-myths-about-trans-athletes-debunked
https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-do-trans-athletes-have-an-advantage-in-elite-sport/a-58583988
Explaining that Trans should not compete in the same gender categorie is simply ignoring the reality of the field and creating a exclusion that is absolutely not necessary and only favors transphobe agendas that can actually lead to trans being targeted or trans killing themself.
Sorry but this is a fallacious question. We don't judge and explain a sociological systemic situation through one's experience. There is a reason why sciences uses large scale tools to understand those problems.
Again, same answer. Because you "lived" something doesn't mean that it represent the reality of the entire society.
Good. Seems like you want to make a change. My advice is simple: Try to elect people who really care first. (meaning actual leftists) . I mean.. you can try voting for conservatists as long as you want.. 5 years, 10 years, 50 years... but if after that you still see people of color being systematically shoot by police without reasons on a systemic basis... or discriminated in housing or in job's opportunities... remember when I said that leftism is the way to go.
And I find it very cool that you actually want to help people of the community.. but remember that the best way to change everything.. is to change those who are in power.
Slay.
Its not my place to tell you how to do that so, courage :)
When it comes to Al or Van, this is their favorite thoughts about me...
Somehow I'm "ignorant of reality"... But strangely, they never explain why. They love to say that I don't know what I'm talking about but when I'm the one actually providing scientific datas and researches (because let's be honest... I'm pretty much the only one here doing that)
.. radio silence !
Meaning that there is absolutely no reason to have a complete ban of trans from competing in the same gender. In reality, the solution should be more inclusive and in a case by case basis.
https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/four-myths-about-trans-athletes-debunked
https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-do-trans-athletes-have-an-advantage-in-elite-sport/a-58583988
Explaining that Trans should not compete in the same gender categorie is simply ignoring the reality of the field and creating a exclusion that is absolutely not necessary and only favors transphobe agendas that can actually lead to trans being targeted or trans killing themself.
Sorry but this is a fallacious question. We don't judge and explain a sociological systemic situation through one's experience. There is a reason why sciences uses large scale tools to understand those problems.
Again, same answer. Because you "lived" something doesn't mean that it represent the reality of the entire society.
Good. Seems like you want to make a change. My advice is simple: Try to elect people who really care first. (meaning actual leftists) . I mean.. you can try voting for conservatists as long as you want.. 5 years, 10 years, 50 years... but if after that you still see people of color being systematically shoot by police without reasons on a systemic basis... or discriminated in housing or in job's opportunities... remember when I said that leftism is the way to go.
And I find it very cool that you actually want to help people of the community.. but remember that the best way to change everything.. is to change those who are in power.
Slay.
Its not my place to tell you how to do that so, courage :)
When it comes to Al or Van, this is their favorite thoughts about me...
Somehow I'm "ignorant of reality"... But strangely, they never explain why. They love to say that I don't know what I'm talking about but when I'm the one actually providing scientific datas and researches (because let's be honest... I'm pretty much the only one here doing that)
.. radio silence !
What happens in Seattle, no other city wants to emulate.
Post automatically merged:
What if the input & observations of the entire community in that area are taken into account?
Obviously, the experience of one person may not tell the whole story, although if numerous people in that community (if not a sizable portion of those) encounter similar challenges, then a more comprehensive understanding of the issue(s) particular to that community can be achieved.
It's also a possibility that one person's view of a systemic situation may be shared by others that are living in his/her community.
You want to understand the challenges faced by a specific community? Best way to do so is to visit that community and well...interview the people that live there.
Last edited:
It would be better of course, but still not enough to understand a systemic problem on the scale of an entire society.
Indeed. That's why sociologists are also using tools to understand the vision of people of a systemic situation. Making science doesn't means that we must negate people's experiences, its just means that we make sure to include all kind of experiences with as less bias as possible.
Yup if you don't forget to look at science at the same time.. and right now, those communities are screaming "BLM". In fact they are not doing it only in the US, but in Europe too were systemic racism and police brutality are also a problem.
Indeed. That's why sociologists are also using tools to understand the vision of people of a systemic situation. Making science doesn't means that we must negate people's experiences, its just means that we make sure to include all kind of experiences with as less bias as possible.
Yup if you don't forget to look at science at the same time.. and right now, those communities are screaming "BLM". In fact they are not doing it only in the US, but in Europe too were systemic racism and police brutality are also a problem.
@Logiko You will have to tell me what laws or regulations we have in the United States that cause this systemic racism here, so I can fight against it. Unless you are talking about some regulations, we have that work against white people and Asians.
There is a difference between systemic racism and racism. You want to say racism exists, 100% agree.
There is a difference between systemic racism and racism. You want to say racism exists, 100% agree.
If people want to face a real systemic problem there is one against poor people in inner cities by democrat policies. Here in my Parish in Louisiana, I can send my children to any school that I want to. I just have to sign a form saying I'm responsible for their transportation.
In inner cities, they have arrested parents for lying about their address so their kids could attend schools with better education and opportunities. These are people who don't have the means to pick the district they live in. They do not care about the children, but the money that lines their pockets from those children because the more students enrolled in your district the more funds they have to spend on "administration costs"
Also, a fun tidbit about that, if you are enrolled in your district and switch schools you can't play sports for a season to prevent parents/schools from rigging the system for competitive advantage.
In inner cities, they have arrested parents for lying about their address so their kids could attend schools with better education and opportunities. These are people who don't have the means to pick the district they live in. They do not care about the children, but the money that lines their pockets from those children because the more students enrolled in your district the more funds they have to spend on "administration costs"
Post automatically merged:
Also, a fun tidbit about that, if you are enrolled in your district and switch schools you can't play sports for a season to prevent parents/schools from rigging the system for competitive advantage.
It's an old general law that many states have or had, many have revised or simply ignore it. It's particular cities that enforce the law. I hope one day we can have our children's tax dollars follow them to pay for private schools, which will force all public schools to step up to meet the needs of children.
It's not even a subject that right-leaning people like to touch often because it affects donors. I think more are becoming outspoken about it now.
It's not even a subject that right-leaning people like to touch often because it affects donors. I think more are becoming outspoken about it now.
That's why I really do like candidates that can fund their campaigns with little assistance from donors because when they are funded by big interests, they work for big interests not the people.
I'm for a voucher program, but I still want the tax dollars to follow the wealthy as well, so it forces these public schools to up their practices and education standards. It doesn't help if they just lose students and not the funds.
Post automatically merged:
I'm for a voucher program, but I still want the tax dollars to follow the wealthy as well, so it forces these public schools to up their practices and education standards. It doesn't help if they just lose students and not the funds.