I agree, but I'll show my sexism. I think able men should want to stay and fight.
This is not sexism but common sense. Men and woman are not equal. It's not like most woman are anything but a liability in a war. Even when you take in account modern weaponry.
Woman, elderly and children should be kept away from the front lines and men should do what they have always done.
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
This is not sexism but common sense. Men and woman are not equal. It's not like most woman are anything but a liability in a war. Even when you take in account modern weaponry.
Woman, elderly and children should be kept away from the front lines and men should do what they have always done.
Agree to some extent. Some women can handle the physical and mental requirements to battle and do it as well as any man.

There was some special force training I researched a couple of years ago where women did struggle in certain areas men succeeded in that weren't minor things at all. The one that stood out to me the most was carrying their wounded partner on their backs, especially if the partner was male.
 
Agree to some extent. Some women can handle the physical and mental requirements to battle and do it as well as any man.

There was some special force training I researched a couple of years ago where women did struggle in certain areas men succeeded in that weren't minor things at all. The one that stood out to me the most was carrying their wounded partner on their backs, especially if the partner was male.
Yes. Not only that but they affect the troops because of male instincts to protect females and the risks of rape and other things. Overall, they are more of a liability than anything. There's a reason why it was always a sign of despair when woman had to take arms.

Btw, I'm watching the state of union and it looks more like empty campaign promises than anything. He is basically stating that he will redo some trump projects but worse. And having as a objective to get 3rd graders to read is sad as fuck.
 
The physical differences between men and women are real but do mental differences even exist?
They do. Though in today’s politically correct world you would be shut down if you dared to say otherwise even if it’s lowkey self evident. The differences aren’t as plainly distinct as the physical differences are but rather across a variety of behaviors and emotions they tend to be distinct. For e.g men are higher risk takers, more assertive, more disagreeable, etc whereas women are usually the opposite in these areas they’re agreeable, not as assertive usually, they have higher emotional intelligence etc. When it comes to IQ they’re the same, other emotions like anger are also the same between men and women.
Agree to some extent. Some women can handle the physical and mental requirements to battle and do it as well as any man.
The reality couldn’t be clearer on this. It’s the same reason why even the most liberal soy countries today haven’t deployed women on the front lines for active combat. I mean women cannot even handle the same physical requirements to match their male counterparts in less intense activity such as sports, take the NBA and WNBA for example, both are professionals in their own right but it’s beyond clear that the product isn’t the same by any stretch of the imagination.
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
The physical differences between men and women are real but do mental differences even exist?
If you are talking about intelligence. There are noted differences, though. Such as women being maturing mentally faster than men. They also both have strengths in different areas than each other, though it's not definite. It's more on scale such as women tend to be more emotional and nuturing.

Yes. Not only that but they affect the troops because of male instincts to protect females and the risks of rape and other things. Overall, they are more of a liability than anything. There's a reason why it was always a sign of despair when woman had to take arms.

Btw, I'm watching the state of union and it looks more like empty campaign promises than anything. He is basically stating that he will redo some trump projects but worse. And having as a objective to get 3rd graders to read is sad as fuck.
I watched the entire thing. I felt like he spewed lies.

Also, I think it's quite offensive when I hear him compare January 6th to the Civil War, like they were on equal terms. Then again, I have seen college-aged kids say that they couldn't say which was worth January 6th or September 11th and some said January 6th. I shouldn't be shocked anymore.

Then he accuses the border crisis on Trump when it's he who undone on the first day the things that kept it secure and he could've fixed it at any time he wanted and still could with a simple pen, but wants to hold Republicans responsible because they don't want to sign a bill with excessive spending for things that have nothing to do with the border.

I think he is out of touch and trying to blame food companies for his inflation. We know we can't afford what we used to under him. We know we have to live off credit under him because we can't afford things like our electric bills and household goods, which has nothing to do with fewer chips in a damn bag.
 
Top