[FNZ] Role Madness Final Fantasy XVI Mafia - Game Thread
- Thread starter Ratchet
- Start date
- Status
Rolecrusher usually targets also passive abilities in addition to active ones.
So if Godfather is making a faction kill and targetted by roleblocker he will be stopped from killing. But rolecrush will also destroy his passives, like cop immunity. I would say that 1-shot rolecrushes typically would stop faction kills, pernament one would not.
So if Godfather is making a faction kill and targetted by roleblocker he will be stopped from killing. But rolecrush will also destroy his passives, like cop immunity. I would say that 1-shot rolecrushes typically would stop faction kills, pernament one would not.
I really dislike the complete ignoring of the discussion over Red Night's lie. The fact that he decided to just ignore it and go on to ask so who do we lynch then. Feels like the most textbook deflection and move on to someone else ploy. Three of the active players asking you to clarify and own up to a mistake in a post or justify it, and you completely ignore it. Scumdar going off like crazy.
Once again @Red Night, if you made a post laying out why Psylocke is scum before Post #161, I'd really like to see it. Or at least an admission that you were wrong.
...That was my whole ass point. That if Emil had doubled down on defending Red Night and sticking to his "but this is his town meta" defense, that would be scummy.
I'll comment as I damn well please, and you can fuck off ya tea cup wearing goober.
What do YOU think is worth it? Would you lynch the claimed roleblocker because of the information from the flip? Or would you rather try proving the role in another way?
Well another town roleblocker for starts. Jailer role would be pretty problematic for a game of this size. Bus drivers would invite some doubt. Role crusher is one of the border line roles for a counter claim for me. Because yes a role crusher does """block""" but the result of misfiring a role crusher can be quite devastating if the town has a concentration of power roles. Basically role crusher falls more under the Vig style roles than blockie style roles.
And now this wagon joining post. I realize that I am alone so far in this adventure. But we are going to need to revisit this. There's no way successful scum play is going to be "get called out" and ignore it into just letting another wagon go on effectively an afk player.
Once again @Red Night, if you made a post laying out why Psylocke is scum before Post #161, I'd really like to see it. Or at least an admission that you were wrong.
...That was my whole ass point. That if Emil had doubled down on defending Red Night and sticking to his "but this is his town meta" defense, that would be scummy.
I'll comment as I damn well please, and you can fuck off ya tea cup wearing goober.
What do YOU think is worth it? Would you lynch the claimed roleblocker because of the information from the flip? Or would you rather try proving the role in another way?
Well another town roleblocker for starts. Jailer role would be pretty problematic for a game of this size. Bus drivers would invite some doubt. Role crusher is one of the border line roles for a counter claim for me. Because yes a role crusher does """block""" but the result of misfiring a role crusher can be quite devastating if the town has a concentration of power roles. Basically role crusher falls more under the Vig style roles than blockie style roles.
And now this wagon joining post. I realize that I am alone so far in this adventure. But we are going to need to revisit this. There's no way successful scum play is going to be "get called out" and ignore it into just letting another wagon go on effectively an afk player.
@MangoSenpai you are trending down for me, I need to see you contribute more.
Cubey read is a nothing afk player slot for me. Literally trying to hit post count from what I can see. Its not a favorable read, but incomplete would be a good word for it. It wouldn't break my heart to see him flip. But what info is there to get from a basically afk player. Not many relationships or friction results.
See post 161, where he said he had explained why he thought Psylocke was scummy before his OMGUS vote, which he did not.
Absolutely possible. I wouldn't town read me just because I made a lump post about a player. I would like the post to be taken at factual value. If my post suspecting Red has flaws or misinformation in it, then I think that's a great indicator that I'm scum.
See post 161, where he said he had explained why he thought Psylocke was scummy before his OMGUS vote, which he did not.
Absolutely possible. I wouldn't town read me just because I made a lump post about a player. I would like the post to be taken at factual value. If my post suspecting Red has flaws or misinformation in it, then I think that's a great indicator that I'm scum.
This is another huge problem for me. The fact he immediately backed off when Psylocke backed off tells me his feelings towards Psylocke were only ever strong when they were OMGUS based. Completely reactive. Match that with the temperature checking posts. It reads heavily as "Player who doesn't care who gets lynched as long as its not themselves."
Hmm... @Red Night did you adress this when Dante inquired? Your read on Psyche: "This is absolutely not OMGUS. I already exposed why I think you're scum, you're the one acting suspect here."
I'm very unsatisfied with the conclusion of the Yoho situation. There's more flip information to be gained there than Cubey because there's already been a claim and a sort of soft counter claim. But a x2 roleblocker is just in that sweet spot between "useful" but not "TOO suspiciously useful".
So I am still chewing on that problem.
So I am still chewing on that problem.
- Status