LGBT+ isn't a belief
The people around that smurf received death threats -and international hate- and people on this forum found nothing better to do than to laugh at it.
The ceremony wasn't even insulting but whatever, you guys should be more chill. The guys behind the show even apologized in order to calm people down. I'm not exploding in rage when someone talks shit about my favorite thinker though.
The people around that smurf received death threats -and international hate- and people on this forum found nothing better to do than to laugh at it.
The ceremony wasn't even insulting but whatever, you guys should be more chill. The guys behind the show even apologized in order to calm people down. I'm not exploding in rage when someone talks shit about my favorite thinker though.
No. I'm simply explaining that its not a big deal. Nuance (that you fail to understand, like always). Also we do not "discriminate" an ideology, we discriminate its believers. No one was discriminated here, it was a ceremony in a western country where christianity remains hegemonic and its believers in position of domination so, don't worry about that.
Yes some religion needs different treatment in fonction of the context. If we were talking about a ceremony mocking christianity were christian are oppressed, then yes, that would have been a bit more problematic. But this is not the case here.
So, relax big man and don't be afraid, your religion will not disappear because of a few Drag Queens.
The guy was obviously Dyonisos and a funny one.. there was absolutely nothing wrong with that. It was funny and I'm sure kids laughed when they saw him.
Those reactionnaries are so insecure..
Yes, exactly. Freedom to believe and freedom to mock.
You literally tried to find a reason to be Islamophobic a few hours ago. Don't give moral lessons about religious oppressions mate, you don't understand them.
Its useless, Mods don't understand the problem with this type of transphobia.
But feel free to test. Go to the r/Trans and ask people if its ok to say that a person with male sexual characteristics is necessarily a man.
You might have fun.
Einstein.
In 2227 pages, you have NEVER given me ONE evidences to prove one of your point on a philosophical, political or scientific basis when ME, on the other hand, have been riddling this thread with many ressources from militants and political video, to philosophical deconstruction to scientific evidences and researches.
The only thing that you know how to do, is to spam the same channel over and over again.
So, same as your mate Nameless, you can spare me the moral lessons about shame. You have none.
Who cares, this is the best political way to react to a social reality.
Actually, the president is probably VERY MAD about this ceremony.
The guys who made it was a leftists. The president is not pro-LGBQT+
This is what we explain when we speek about disruption. It was not direct at you, but toward the gov first.
Ye, because you are targeting people, not an ideology.
Ideology/Belief = / = People.
The ONLY case where you need to be careful is the case where said belief is oppressed.
This is not the case here.
Yes some religion needs different treatment in fonction of the context. If we were talking about a ceremony mocking christianity were christian are oppressed, then yes, that would have been a bit more problematic. But this is not the case here.
So, relax big man and don't be afraid, your religion will not disappear because of a few Drag Queens.
The guy was obviously Dyonisos and a funny one.. there was absolutely nothing wrong with that. It was funny and I'm sure kids laughed when they saw him.
Those reactionnaries are so insecure..
Yes, exactly. Freedom to believe and freedom to mock.
You literally tried to find a reason to be Islamophobic a few hours ago. Don't give moral lessons about religious oppressions mate, you don't understand them.
Its useless, Mods don't understand the problem with this type of transphobia.
But feel free to test. Go to the r/Trans and ask people if its ok to say that a person with male sexual characteristics is necessarily a man.
You might have fun.
Einstein.
In 2227 pages, you have NEVER given me ONE evidences to prove one of your point on a philosophical, political or scientific basis when ME, on the other hand, have been riddling this thread with many ressources from militants and political video, to philosophical deconstruction to scientific evidences and researches.
The only thing that you know how to do, is to spam the same channel over and over again.
So, same as your mate Nameless, you can spare me the moral lessons about shame. You have none.
Who cares, this is the best political way to react to a social reality.
Actually, the president is probably VERY MAD about this ceremony.
The guys who made it was a leftists. The president is not pro-LGBQT+
This is what we explain when we speek about disruption. It was not direct at you, but toward the gov first.
Ye, because you are targeting people, not an ideology.
Ideology/Belief = / = People.
The ONLY case where you need to be careful is the case where said belief is oppressed.
This is not the case here.
I would understand targeting individuals with insults. Example: "Joe is stupid because he likes to get buttfucked". This is a personal insult. "Buttfuckers are stupid". This is not a personal insult, no individuals were target here. Making broad statements isn't a personal attack.
Is it disrespectful towards individuals that qualify to this, yes? But so is what happened in the Olympics and yet no individuals were targeted and nobody has grounds for a sue. Why the fuck should public insults to homosexuals get different treatment? This is a biased legislation.
Also, show me the quote where i justified Islamophobia, cunt. Another one of your lies. You have no ground to stand on, so you lie and twist things.
Last edited: