Powers & Abilities Debunking Literally Every Argument Against Ryokugyu’s Black Blade UPDATE: Remembering The Fallen
- Thread starter Elder Lee Hung
- Start date
Issho
best CoO + sword skills with his supreme grade ( i believe he can make air pressure slashes like Mihawk/Zoro )
Aramaki
Oda seems to be going CoA specialist route for him
Outside of that maybe he's the 2nd strongest Admiral physically behind Akainu, at least in Endurance or Durability, Oda made him very muscular + the tallest at 308 cm
Sakazuki
If Issho's CoO & Aramaki's CoA, then Oda will probably make Akainu's best haki CoC
best CoO + sword skills with his supreme grade ( i believe he can make air pressure slashes like Mihawk/Zoro )
Aramaki
Oda seems to be going CoA specialist route for him
Outside of that maybe he's the 2nd strongest Admiral physically behind Akainu, at least in Endurance or Durability, Oda made him very muscular + the tallest at 308 cm
Sakazuki
If Issho's CoO & Aramaki's CoA, then Oda will probably make Akainu's best haki CoC
So we went from "its not a black blade!" to "Its not a sword, its a wood bokken (based on absolutely nothing, not even colors)" once it became obvious it was black?
What will the next goalpost be?
That it is a metal blade but it doesn't count as a sword? That its black because its made from damascus steel? That it is a black blade but he's not a real swordsman? Seriously though, the power level agenda mentality is causing brain damage. The arguments in OP are getting worse than the DBZ huehue-tardation.
What will the next goalpost be?
That it is a metal blade but it doesn't count as a sword? That its black because its made from damascus steel? That it is a black blade but he's not a real swordsman? Seriously though, the power level agenda mentality is causing brain damage. The arguments in OP are getting worse than the DBZ huehue-tardation.
That is a result of basing the entire argument off of GB's weapon appearance. Instead looking at how Oda writes black blades.
Claiming GB has a black blade just because it looks like one is no longer a valid argument when other weapons exist that turned out to be different than what they appeared to be.
These are not metal swords. They are biscuits.
This is not a sword. It's a short blade.
This is not a wooden walking stick. It's a sword.
Thats 3 examples of weapons that were different than what they appeared to be. GB possessing a wooden sword created from his DF is a stronger argument and makes more sense than him having a black blade.
Claiming that's impossible goes against the mangs since Cracker proved it's possible to create swords that look like real metal swords from DF power.
The argument people thought was solid and unbreakable has been shattered. Now you all are left broken and defeated.
That is a result of basing the entire argument off of GB's weapon appearance. Instead looking at how Oda writes black blades.
Claiming GB has a black blade just because it looks like one is no longer a valid argument when other weapons exist that turned out to be different than what they appeared to be.
These are not metal swords. They are biscuits.
This is not a sword. It's a short blade.
This is not a wooden walking stick. It's a sword.
Thats 3 examples of weapons that were different than what they appeared to be. GB possessing a wooden sword created from his DF is a stronger argument and makes more sense than him having a black blade.
Claiming that's impossible goes against the mangs since Cracker proved it's possible to create swords that look like real metal swords from DF power.
That is a result of basing the entire argument off of GB's weapon appearance. Instead looking at how Oda writes black blades.
Claiming GB has a black blade just because it looks like one is no longer a valid argument when other weapons exist that turned out to be different than what they appeared to be.
These are not metal swords. They are biscuits.
This is not a sword. It's a short blade.
This is not a wooden walking stick. It's a sword.
Thats 3 examples of weapons that were different than what they appeared to be. GB possessing a wooden sword created from his DF is a stronger argument and makes more sense than him having a black blade.
Claiming that's impossible goes against the mangs since Cracker proved it's possible to create swords that look like real metal swords from DF power.
Black blades are weapons people are proud to possess. Oda has black blade users show off their swords shortly after they are introduced and tells us their black blades. That's how we know a weapon is a black blade.
Mihawk and Ryuma both told us their weapons were black blades.
That didn't happen with Aramaki's weapon. It's been 83 chapter since Aramaki's weapon was revived and there are no scenes stating it's a black blade.
Oda has Mihawk and Ryuma show off and use their black blade immediately.
The strength of their opponents are irrelevant. Mihawk and Ryuma used it against fodder.
We didn't see any of that from GB. If GB has a black blade why did Oda change it for GB. He has had plenty of opportunities and opponents to use his weapon against.
GB battle in the Holy Land would have been the the perfect opportunity since his DF power was to destructive to use there. Strong swordsman know how to control their cutting and destructive power.
What's even more interesting is the weapons he gave Fujitora and GB as a child.
Oda gave Fujitora a training sword and an outfit almost identical to Ryuma's outfit. Yet GB was giving a wooden club. It's almost like Oda is trying to tell us something. Especially when you look at their adult weapons. Fujitora has a sword that looks like a wooden walking stick. Since that's true, what weapon do you think he gave GB? A black blade or a wooden sword that looks like a black blade?
Mihawk and Ryuma both told us their weapons were black blades.
That didn't happen with Aramaki's weapon. It's been 83 chapter since Aramaki's weapon was revived and there are no scenes stating it's a black blade.
Oda has Mihawk and Ryuma show off and use their black blade immediately.
The strength of their opponents are irrelevant. Mihawk and Ryuma used it against fodder.
We didn't see any of that from GB. If GB has a black blade why did Oda change it for GB. He has had plenty of opportunities and opponents to use his weapon against.
GB battle in the Holy Land would have been the the perfect opportunity since his DF power was to destructive to use there. Strong swordsman know how to control their cutting and destructive power.
What's even more interesting is the weapons he gave Fujitora and GB as a child.
Oda gave Fujitora a training sword and an outfit almost identical to Ryuma's outfit. Yet GB was giving a wooden club. It's almost like Oda is trying to tell us something. Especially when you look at their adult weapons. Fujitora has a sword that looks like a wooden walking stick. Since that's true, what weapon do you think he gave GB? A black blade or a wooden sword that looks like a black blade?
Here we go again.
Does Cracker biscuit army weapons look like biscuits or real metal swords?
You could claim all you want that that's real sword but in reality it's a biscuit.
That scene make your argument invalid. Claiming GB has a black blade just because it look like one is not proof. We have never even seen GB use the weapon so you don't know if that's a metal sword. That could very easily be a wooden sword made from his df power. That makes much more sense than him having a black blade.
I'm talking how a character handles a black blade. Try reading the manga.
Does Cracker biscuit army weapons look like biscuits or real metal swords?
You could claim all you want that that's real sword but in reality it's a biscuit.
That scene make your argument invalid. Claiming GB has a black blade just because it look like one is not proof. We have never even seen GB use the weapon so you don't know if that's a metal sword. That could very easily be a wooden sword made from his df power. That makes much more sense than him having a black blade.
I'm talking how a character handles a black blade. Try reading the manga.
Here we go again.
Does Cracker biscuit army weapons look like biscuits or real metal swords?
You could claim all you want that that's real sword but in reality it's a biscuit.
That scene make your argument invalid. Claiming GB has a black blade just because it look like one is not proof. We have never even seen GB use the weapon so you don't know if that's a metal sword. That could very easily be a wooden sword made from his df power. That makes much more sense than him having a black blade.
I'm talking how a character handles a black blade. Try reading the manga.
Does Cracker biscuit army weapons look like biscuits or real metal swords?
You could claim all you want that that's real sword but in reality it's a biscuit.
That scene make your argument invalid. Claiming GB has a black blade just because it look like one is not proof. We have never even seen GB use the weapon so you don't know if that's a metal sword. That could very easily be a wooden sword made from his df power. That makes much more sense than him having a black blade.
I'm talking how a character handles a black blade. Try reading the manga.
Also doesn't Akainu take the best offense by default? @Owl Ki @Elder Lee Hung
The author himself practically confirmed that was pretty much his thing lol.
The author himself practically confirmed that was pretty much his thing lol.
He also kind of shot himself in the foot there because since Cracker is able to make biscuit swords then why carry a real sword to begin with?, since that's his argument for Aramaki. Also why keep it on your person when you can just spawn it mid fight and catch your opponent off guard?. Unless he believes that some random commander is more likely to carry a real meito sword and be somewhat proficient at it than a literal top tier who would be facing far stronger foes with apparently a "sword" made of wood that we already know is very much cuttable.
