My main point here was that they were at the top of my list because they were part of the same voting pattern as Flower, but that since Alexis flipped town while having the same pattern, I could no longer consider that strong evidence.
But why in your opinion was that strong evidence to begin with?
Wouldn't you assume that scums would generally try to avoid these kinds of needless trails of evidence linking them together?
That's the part that kind of puzzles me a little bit.
And even if, as you say, their voting patterns is no longer of the utmost concern - you still implied that Watson's posts increased in quality and seemed to be trying to solve etc.
This does not align with, in the very least, my world view.
So FMPoV, the way you're presenting this whole thing is ever so slightly inauspicious