Biggest 2025 expectation?

  • Nami cutting her hair

    Votes: 21 13.4%
  • Shanks not having a twin

    Votes: 12 7.6%
  • Finding One Piece

    Votes: 7 4.5%
  • Imu face reveal

    Votes: 97 61.8%
  • Vegaskunk finally dying

    Votes: 20 12.7%

  • Total voters
    157
You think Loki will destroy the Adam tree ? Or the heaven part of elbaf ?
In part yes, not all of it though. Maybe the heaven world as you said.

I think the possible destruction of Adam will be the (usual) end of the arc countdown, as the birdcage was in DR, as BM and the cake was in WC, as Onigashima falling onto the Flower capital was Wano's etc.
Oda uses this trope every time.

This time we know Loki wants to "destroy the world" and he believes he is the (destroyer) Nika, so the stake is going to be Adam burning down, and with that Erbaf's downfall.
 
Loki is literally the main villain/threat of this saga.
Absolutely not, those are the knights. Loki has done absolutely nothing wrong to date.

It's the others who spit shit on him


I don't know how Oda could have been more transparent, especially after the only one that could have been the main threat instead of him, Shamrock, packed his things.
Um, no. On the contrary.....
I mean, last chapter we even has this:



because lighting make fire.

And based on the hints, we are about to see Loki's lightning powers.
And.....so ?


How Oda can be clearer? That this will be the final countdown?
There would be knights who want to attack Elbaf, but details



After everyone said Loki is a manace?
Just like everyone said that Zoro was a bloodthirsty monster.

That Kureha was a witch.

That Riku was a crazy arsonist

That Robin was a demonic child

That Chopper was a monster.

Should I continue?



After even Gaban hinted that Luffy will have to deal with Loki?
Oh right, Gaban....

But Gaban knows that Elbaf is under attack yes? And he knows that Ruf has like beaten an emperor?

After the destroyer Nika/laughing Nika thing?
I don't get it
Post automatically merged:

In part yes, not all of it though. Maybe the heaven world as you said.
But why should he do that?


think the possible destruction of Adam will be the (usual) end of the arc countdown, as the birdcage was in DR, as BM and the cake was in WC, as Onigashima falling onto th
I still don't understand why Loki would do this since he hasn't shown any hatred towards Elbaf in particular so far, but ok


This time we know Loki wants to "destroy the world"

You know that destroy the world has other meanings too, right?
Post automatically merged:

What ?
Post automatically merged:

The only HK i woukd worry about is Shamrock and he's going back to the Holy Land.
But I don't think so. They say this, but he doesn't seem to be interested.


I certainly fear Loki more than Gunko or Killingham lmao
And.....
Why? No seriously, why?


He has something against Harald and killed his father
I agree that maybe Harald was the bad guy but still

And Loki is linked to ragnarok

So I would be surprised if Loki will be destroying the upper half of Elbaf at least and the « heaven » part who is likely « fake » and ruled by the former evil king
But I thought he would have done it much, much earlier... instead, immediately after his father's death, he ran away.
 
Absolutely not, those are the knights. Loki has done absolutely nothing wrong to date.

It's the others who spit shit on him



Um, no. On the contrary.....

And.....so ?



There would be knights who want to attack Elbaf, but details





Just like everyone said that Zoro was a bloodthirsty monster.

That Kureha was a witch.

That Riku was a crazy arsonist

That Robin was a demonic child

That Chopper was a monster.

Should I continue?




Oh right, Gaban....

But Gaban knows that Elbaf is under attack yes? And he knows that Ruf has like beaten an emperor?



I don't get it
Post automatically merged:


But why should he do that?



I still don't understand why Loki would do this since he hasn't shown any hatred towards Elbaf in particular so far, but ok





You know that destroy the world has other meanings too, right?
Post automatically merged:


What ?
So Hajrudin is completely wrong about Loki even though he knows him since their childhood?:seriously:
I do think Loki will switch to the good guys at the end of the arc but he is build up as antagonist right now
 
Wano A1 - the SHs explore Wano
Wano A2 - the SHs are defeated
Wano A3 - the SHs defeat the BPs
Wano A3.5 - Yamato vs BPs remnants
Wano A4 - BB attacks Wano
Wano A5 - Wano joins Final War
Wano A6 - Wano leads the creation of the epilogue new world gov
Wano A7 - Wano falls into chaos as the OP spin-off begins
Wano A8 - MechaKaido returns as a punching bag for Luffy's son, Buffy
Wano A9 - MechaKaido and Buffy travel the solar system in search of the magical haki spheres
Wano A10 - the alien planet that inspired Wano Kuni's culture is finally revealed
Wano A11 - back on earth, BB's reincarnated soul possesses Wano's best warriors
Wano A12 - Buffy, MechaKaido, and their E.T. allies return to liberate Wano
Wano A13 - The One Piece Franchise Isn't Doing So Well Lately, We'Ve Been Milking It For 20 Years Since Oda-sensei's Death
Wano A14 - Act 1 of the Super Saga
 
So Hajrudin is completely wrong about Loki even though he knows him since their childhood?:seriously:
So we have to just rely on what he says despite his obvious bias towards Loki because of his father (father who for all we know he may not have killed?)


I do think Loki will switch to the good guys at the end of the arc but he is build up as antagonist right now
Um no.

He has done absolutely nothing wrong to date.
 
Absolutely not, those are the knights. Loki has done absolutely nothing wrong to date.

It's the others who spit shit on him
Absolutely yes.

And it's not like saying "absolutely not" is countering the facts.


Um, no. On the contrary.....
Same as before: saying "on the contrary" to a fact that disprove your theory is not going to change the fact itself.

And.....so ?
So, as I have proved to you, it's Loki the main threat.


There would be knights who want to attack Elbaf, but details
And they will be dealt with, no doubt.

Just like everyone said that Zoro was a bloodthirsty monster.

That Kureha was a witch.

That Riku was a crazy arsonist

That Robin was a demonic child

That Chopper was a monster.

Should I continue?
If with continue you are going to quote a real example and not cases that has nothing to do with Loki's, you might.

If you can find some cases of all positive and important character having said the same thing about someone, who killed his own father, who himself said he wants to destroy the world, go on.


Oh right, Gaban....

But Gaban knows that Elbaf is under attack yes? And he knows that Ruf has like beaten an emperor?
It's called foreshadowing,

I don't get it
The fight si clearly going to be about asserting who the "real" Nika is, and what it represent: destruction or laugh/liberation

 
Did kaido and King fly extra low so Shanks could see and approach them?

They could've flown 2km high and would be reaching marineford EASILY

Maybe he wanted Mihawk's inferior to see and stop him so he doesn't have to face Mihawk. After all, we know he never dared to speak up when Mihawk pissed in his territories :endthis:
 
Loki slightly insulted Shanks. Luffy won't forgive him just like Doffy killed people for laughing at his crew
Kidd also hates Shanks, yet Luffy considers him a friend.



Absolutely yes.

And it's not like saying "absolutely not" is countering the facts.
The fact that Loki has done nothing wrong other than being treated like shit by the other giants?



Same as before: saying "on the contrary" to a fact that disprove your theory is not going to change the fact itself.
The fact that the last time we saw Shamrock he was making a maniac face while talking about a game?


So, as I have proved to you, it's Loki the main threat.
Because....


And they will be dealt with, no doubt.
Between people who are conspiring against Elbaf and one who has done nothing against Elbaf to date (nothing that we have seen) who is the real threat?


If with continue you are going to quote a real example and not cases that has nothing to do with Loki's, you might.
Tizio presented by most as a monster who should not have been born or existed.

The guy turns out to be a monster who should not have been born or existed.

How many times has it happened


who killed his own father,
A fact that coincidentally has no witnesses, except a dumb old man with a sword on his head. How strange


It's called foreshadowing,
I repeat, Gaban knows that Elbaf's children are about to be threatened by someone other than Loki, right?


The fight si clearly going to be about asserting who the "real" Nika is, and what it represent: destruction or laugh
So, Luffy ?
 
Top