Questions & Mysteries Did Marco look good against top tiers because none of them tried to use haki

#21
I never claimed that they could be, only that your claim that they can't be is headcanon.

He said it hurt, I'm not going to ignore that even if you will.
If you don't claim it then you agree elemental attacks cannot be coated with CoA.

No bruises, smiling, Marco called Kizaru a liar as a respond Marco said he was hurt sorry you are lying no opinion these are lies.
 
#22
If you don't claim it then you agree elemental attacks cannot be coated with CoA.

No bruises, smiling, Marco called Kizaru a liar as a respond Marco said he was hurt sorry you are lying no opinion these are lies.
I've made neither claim, they are both headcanon and unprovable.

He said it hurt, I'm not going to ignore that even if you will.
 
#23
I've made neither claim, they are both headcanon and unprovable.

He said it hurt, I'm not going to ignore that even if you will.
So your claim elemental attacks can be coated with haki is headcannon got it so the conclusion is elemental attacks cannot be coated with haki.

No bruises, smiling, Marco called Kizaru a liar as a respond Marco said he was hurt sorry you are lying no opinion these are lies.
 
#24
So your claim elemental attacks can be coated with haki is headcannon got it so the conclusion is elemental attacks cannot be coated with haki.

No bruises, smiling, Marco called Kizaru a liar as a respond Marco said he was hurt sorry you are lying no opinion these are lies.
Claiming that they can be and claiming that they can't be are both headcanon and unprovable.

He said it hurt, I'm not going to ignore that even if you will.
 
#25
Claiming that they can be and claiming that they can't be are both headcanon and unprovable.

He said it hurt, I'm not going to ignore that even if you will.
The correct statement is they cannot be coated with haki no panels of those.

No bruises, smiling, Marco called Kizaru a liar as a respond Marco said he was hurt sorry you are lying no opinion these are lies.
 
#27
That's your headcanon.
It’s not headcanon to say that elemental attacks can’t be coated with Haki. It’s an observation based on canonical evidence. In the manga, we’ve never seen anyone coat an elemental attack with Haki, even though many characters like Akainu, Enel, Sabo, and Marco could have. Oda consistently shows Haki being applied to physical attacks or weapons, not intangibles.


So while it’s technically possible that Oda could reveal it in the future, the current canon supports that it can’t be done since there’s zero instance or implication of it happening. That’s not headcanon. That’s basing conclusions on what’s actually shown in the story.
 
#28
It’s not headcanon to say that elemental attacks can’t be coated with Haki. It’s an observation based on canonical evidence. In the manga, we’ve never seen anyone coat an elemental attack with Haki, even though many characters like Akainu, Enel, Sabo, and Marco could have. Oda consistently shows Haki being applied to physical attacks or weapons, not intangibles.

So while it’s technically possible that Oda could reveal it in the future, the current canon supports that it can’t be done since there’s zero instance or implication of it happening. That’s not headcanon. That’s basing conclusions on what’s actually shown in the story.
Most logia showing are pre-timeskip where haki was completely invisible. Even post-timeskip, haki is still invisible a large amount of the time.

Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, it is neither said nor shown anywhere that haki cannot be applied to elemental attacks, so it remains your headcanon that they cannot be.
 
#29
Most logia showing are pre-timeskip where haki was completely invisible. Even post-timeskip, haki is still invisible a large amount of the time.

Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, it is neither said nor shown anywhere that haki cannot be applied to elemental attacks, so it remains your headcanon that they cannot be.
True, Haki wasn’t visible pretimeskip, but that doesn’t change how it functions. Even when Haki was invisible, Oda still showed its effects clearly such as physical blows landing on Logias, weapons being coated, or Haki clashes creating force. There has never been any indication that a purely elemental attack has ever interacted with Haki the way physical attacks do.

Oda did not show haki coating in Kizaru lasers, Big Mom Prometheus, Kaido Boro Breath after TS.


“Absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence” only applies when there’s a reasonable expectation it could exist unseen. But in this case, there have been dozens of opportunities for elemental users to use Haki offensively Akainu, Enel, Kizaru, Sabo, Marco, etc. and none have ever demonstrated it. That’s not just absence of evidence; it’s a consistent pattern across hundreds of chapters.


So until Oda shows elemental Haki coating, saying “it can be done” remains speculative. Saying “it hasn’t been shown and there’s no indication of it” isn’t headcanon it’s sticking to what the manga actually establishes.
 
#30
True, Haki wasn’t visible pretimeskip, but that doesn’t change how it functions. Even when Haki was invisible, Oda still showed its effects clearly such as physical blows landing on Logias, weapons being coated, or Haki clashes creating force. There has never been any indication that a purely elemental attack has ever interacted with Haki the way physical attacks do.

Oda did not show haki coating in Kizaru lasers, Big Mom Prometheus, Kaido Boro Breath after TS.


“Absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence” only applies when there’s a reasonable expectation it could exist unseen. But in this case, there have been dozens of opportunities for elemental users to use Haki offensively Akainu, Enel, Kizaru, Sabo, Marco, etc. and none have ever demonstrated it. That’s not just absence of evidence; it’s a consistent pattern across hundreds of chapters.


So until Oda shows elemental Haki coating, saying “it can be done” remains speculative. Saying “it hasn’t been shown and there’s no indication of it” isn’t headcanon it’s sticking to what the manga actually establishes.
I'm not going to entertain your AI generated posts buddy, your claim is just headcanon and supported by nothing in the manga.
 
#31
I'm not going to entertain your AI generated posts buddy, your claim is just headcanon and supported by nothing in the manga.
It's not an Ai I'm just being logical when Oda never shows elemental attack can be coated with haki. I don't need to prove something that doesn't exist.
Post automatically merged:

There’s zero example in the manga of anyone coating an elemental attack with haki, even though plenty of characters could have. You’re the one assuming something exists without evidence. I’m just going off what’s actually there.
 
#32
It's not an Ai I'm just being logical when Oda never shows elemental attack can be coated with haki. I don't need to prove something that doesn't exist.
That post was blatantly written by an AI, you're fooling nobody.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, the manga never shows or states that an elemental attack cannot be infused with haki either, both claims are unsupported and just headcanon.
 
#33
That post was blatantly written by an AI, you're fooling nobody.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, the manga never shows or states that an elemental attack cannot be infused with haki either, both claims are unsupported and just headcanon.
Not ai just because it made you butthurt.

Why is it that none of the characters who use elemental attacks have ever been shown coating those attacks with haki?
 
#34
Not ai just because it made you butthurt.

Why is it that none of the characters who use elemental attacks have ever been shown coating those attacks with haki?
It definitely was AI, you think I didn't see all the "—" dashes before you removed them lol? It's an obvious telltale sign of AI written paragraphs.

Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
 
#35
It definitely was AI, you think I didn't see all the "—" dashes before you removed them lol? It's an obvious telltale sign of AI written paragraphs.

Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
I can add dash whenever I like it. You got butthurt because you cannot refute what I posted.

None of the characters who use elemental attacks have ever been shown to coat their attacks with haki

You can repeat the same things again but if you cannot answer that your arguments are null.
 
#37
I caught your ass bro:milaugh:

Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
Since when human cannot use dash :milaugh:

We’ve seen plenty of fights with logia and elemental users since haki was introduced, and not once has oda shown or hinted at elemental haki coating. When something could have easily been shown dozens of times but never is, it’s reasonable to assume it doesn’t exist in the story. Saying it can be done without any proof is speculation. Saying it hasn’t been shown is just sticking to what’s actually in the manga.:milaugh:
 
#38
Since when human cannot use dash :milaugh:

We’ve seen plenty of fights with logia and elemental users since haki was introduced, and not once has oda shown or hinted at elemental haki coating. When something could have easily been shown dozens of times but never is, it’s reasonable to assume it doesn’t exist in the story. Saying it can be done without any proof is speculation. Saying it hasn’t been shown is just sticking to what’s actually in the manga.:milaugh:
You're a funny guy, I'll grant you that:ihaha:
 
#39
You're a funny guy, I'll grant you that:ihaha:
We’ve seen plenty of fights with logia and elemental users since haki was introduced, and not once has oda shown or hinted at elemental haki coating. When something could have easily been shown dozens of times but never is, it’s reasonable to assume it doesn’t exist in the story. Saying it can be done without any proof is speculation. Saying it hasn’t been shown is just sticking to what’s actually in the manga. :ihaha:

I'm still waiting for your rebuttal :ihaha:
 
#40
We’ve seen plenty of fights with logia and elemental users since haki was introduced, and not once has oda shown or hinted at elemental haki coating. When something could have easily been shown dozens of times but never is, it’s reasonable to assume it doesn’t exist in the story. Saying it can be done without any proof is speculation. Saying it hasn’t been shown is just sticking to what’s actually in the manga. :ihaha:

I'm still waiting for your rebuttal :ihaha:
Wait a minute, you're that one guy who keeps making alt accounts and getting banned, aren't you? Damn, how didn't I notice that earlier...
:crazwhat:
 
Top