What fruit does Loki have?


  • Total voters
    123
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
The question is, why does it matter? Does he need to deliberately abstain from using weapons other than a sword in order to be considered a swordsman? What exactly is the debate about? That Mihawk would still be the WSS if he lost in a fight with a sword-using Harald, because Harald (while controlled and on a killing spree) is not dedicated to using a sword?
Ipponmatsu didn't even consider the sword-carrying Zoro to be a "real swordsman" until he pulled the Kitetsu stunt. Yes, you can't just casually toss aside your sword and start fighting with an axe in the middle of a serious battle (when you can easily just retrieve your sword or just start using Ittoryu with another sword), and still be considered a real swordsman.
 
All the damage rocks took before the final attack was not heal.
We did not see any regen or was it mention that rocks heal.
What was said was he was using his CoC to cancel out the attacks done by that garp and roger .
So why would he need to heal when he has ben cancelling out the damage ?
That is why they said they had to do one big attack because rocks was not getting damage .

The fight was loki giving him 4 hits and he healing from them .
If we going with what Gaban said it was not strong damage since Harald heal fast .
Then harald allow him to kill him .

Read over chapter 1165 rocks had no damage to heal because he was cancelling out roger and garp attack with his CoC so there was no damage.
Rocks wasn't cancelling out the attacks: he was talking them and still regen them. Obv. not all of them: he manage to stop some of them, as Harald.
Roger and Garp couldn't go beyond his defence and deal actual long standing damange to him.

On the other hand, as said, 17 YO Loki, in 1vs1, was able to make Harald return to his sences and wasn't even that damaged.
After the got the fruit, the fight was quite one sided.

But I say even more: id It Is as you say, Loki would be even more incredibile since Roger and Garp couldn't go beyond Rocks defence while Loki did more than once.
 
So gaban and shanks did damage harald, why was wg lying
Why do you think 😂 if young shanks is able to cut off Harold’s leg then older shanks possibility of soloing Loki goes up.
Me personally I’m fine either I just know the melt down will be hilarious on here and definitely on twitter with shank fans.
 
So did Loki end Harald with too stronk CoC haki, or did Harald let him? It feels confusing rn..

Loki ate a strong df, he shouldn't be better at Haki than Shanks or Gaban?​
 
Extreme diff emotional battle with a Rocks equal while wielding legendary weapon as a 10x bigger giant and still doesn't come anywhere near close Puncture Willy levels of AP and devastation :risitears: Oda really pulled out all the stops and corners with Traffy this man. He remain the bar for any AP powerscaling that wanna be creeped. Even this CoC can only stop immortal gimmick just a cheap extension of Amputate/Radio knife:hihihi: @park_min young @Roo @MonsterKaido @Heart pirate @MonochromeYoru @Kurozumi Wiwi
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top