[FNZ] Super Role Madness Pokemon: I choose you!

Status
Not open for further replies.
BigTimeAnimeMan

BigTimeAnimeMan

‎
#8,301
#8,301
York said:
I did try to ISO Rej and Yoho but I gleaned very little from it(big surprise). I dont think Yoho plays around a teammate the way he did around Polar, so townread on Polar

Only thing that stuck out to me from Rej was this:

And I read Crying town off of this. Flower, Crying and I are the only ones who haven't flipped here. Flower is presumably town, and I know that I am town. If I left some kind of anti-spew nonsense legacy like this, I would either include more than 1 scum mate or none at all, so if the rest of it is town then I think crying is probably also town
Click to expand...

Jesus Christ lol
 
BigTimeAnimeMan

BigTimeAnimeMan

‎
#8,312
#8,312
Crying bc no Cryo said:
I can uh

try ig

lemme pull up my calculator thingy
Click to expand...
Ok
If you’re town it’s pretty dangerous to be writing people off because you assume the scum team have a certain number lol so you should account for both but realistically you should be reading people on play anyway. I don’t think there’s too much point trying to solve for an entire team when there’s 4 or 5 left because you can assume they’re not all poorly distanced. If you’re gonna use that kind of solving, you should just prioritise the player you can fit in the most teams
 
BigTimeAnimeMan

BigTimeAnimeMan

‎
#8,315
#8,315
York said:
Do you think Flower is scum?
Click to expand...
No, but the logic they’d include more than 1 scum or no scum is so arbitrary and terrible and based on pretty much nothing like I can’t really make sense of it

If anything, listing about 6 people and only having 1 mate there is good? It’s hardly like you’re narrowing it down is it
 
York

York

‎
#8,317
#8,317
BigTimeAnimeMan said:
No, but the logic they’d include more than 1 scum or no scum is so arbitrary and terrible and based on pretty much nothing like I can’t really make sense of it

If anything, listing about 6 people and only having 1 mate there is good? It’s hardly like you’re narrowing it down is it
Click to expand...
You're clearly not skilled in the art of anti-spew, Poyser. Its an obvious shell game. A scum player put 6 cups in front of you. In some games it might shake out with you taking a cup off the board, then them, then you, but this has shaken out even simpler. The scum team lifted up 3 cups all on their own, all green(well. One of those cups was a special circumstance). There are 3 cups left. If there was 1 red hidden among those three cups it would be far too fair a game.
 
gingerbread

gingerbread

‎
#8,318
#8,318
BigTimeAnimeMan said:
Do we even know there’s 5 left Breh?
Click to expand...
Actually I'm pretty much basing off of your golden rule of 33% hostiles. I remember how you argued about it with DKKoba in Scrubs game dead chat (BTW I gotta watch these new Scrubs episodes). Some people throw out number 25%.

So 26 players.

25% is 6.5.
33% is 8.6.


So I came up that it's probably 8, 7+1. 9 would be 35% hostiles which seems like an overkill. 8 is 32% so fits.

I think it's quite solid guess.
 
BigTimeAnimeMan

BigTimeAnimeMan

‎
#8,319
#8,319
York said:
You're clearly not skilled in the art of anti-spew, Poyser. Its an obvious shell game. A scum player put 6 cups in front of you. In some games it might shake out with you taking a cup off the board, then them, then you, but this has shaken out even simpler. The scum team lifted up 3 cups all on their own, all green(well. One of those cups was a special circumstance). There are 3 cups left. If there was 1 red hidden among those three cups it would be far too fair a game.
Click to expand...
The problem with that, genius, is that nobody knows whether or not there is 1 red cup, 2 red cups or 0 red cups so the game doesn’t exist how you described it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top