Speculations Mihawk & Imu Conection Solved. Mihawk is "Nerona" Confirmed?

Ryuma was a normal guy with a 3rd ranked sword who made himself strong.
? How is that relevant to what i said
You seems to believe that they are not parallels but inverse
Zoro is releated to famous guy, the inverse of that is that mihawk wouldnt be

Blud seeing words like "weak" and "strong" or "special" where there is none :josad:
 

TheAncientCenturion

I will never forgive Oda
‎‎‎
Dracule means son of devil
It’s clearly derived from Dracula though which means son of the dragon.

[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.88)]Vlad the Impaler was also known as Vlad III Dracula. The name Dracula means “son of Dracul.” In the Romanian language today, dracul means “the devil”—drac is “devil,” ul is “the”—but it is derived from the Latin dracō, “dragon.” (Dragons have been historically associated with Satan, hence the evolution.)[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.88)]Now, “son of Dracul” is a reference to Vlad’s father, who was a member of the Order of the Dragon, a Christian society of knights in the manner of Crusaders. The order chose as its patron saint, St. George, famed for his legendary slaying of a dragon.[/COLOR]
It’s more so a dragon connection than devil
 
It’s clearly derived from Dracula though which means son of the dragon.


It’s more so a dragon connection than devil
In this case, it means both things actually. Draculea (Dracula) means both the son of the Dragon and the son of Dracul (the devil).

It means Dragon in a more direct way because Vlad II was part of the Societas Draconistarum, with Vlad III's father being part of the organization.
However, it also means son of the Devil because Vlad Tepes' father was actually named/called "Vlad II Dracul" which literally means/evolved to mean Devil in Romanian. His ruthless and more sadistic methods of killing and punishing people also lead to this 'son of the devil' monicker.

On top of that, the biblical book of Revelations uses the image of a red dragon to depict the devil and his minions.

It's basically historical context VS modern connotation. And knowing Oda, I firmly believe that we should keep in mind both options. Especially the one that makes more sense (Devil) since you know, imo, I don't personally seeing Mihawk being "the son of the Dragon" going anywhere.
 
Last edited:
The Dragon is what they call the Devil a few times in the Bible @Blax Blah can correct me.

Revelation 12:9 - And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.


BTW, Leviathan is mentioned in the Bible, and he may or may not be the devil, there's some stuff about it in Job, but


There is a painting named "the destruction of Leviathan"





And a panel of Luffy vs Kaido parallels it






Also Leviathan is called the dragon that is in the sea

And Kaido was theorised to have the fish fish fruit
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
Revelation 12:9 - And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.


BTW, Leviathan is mentioned in the Bible, and he may or may not be the devil, there's some stuff about it in Job, but


There is a painting named "the destruction of Leviathan"





And a panel of Luffy vs Kaido parallels it






Also Leviathan is called the dragon that is in the sea

And Kaido was theorised to have the fish fish fruit
Imus weapon is the leviathan
 
It’s clearly derived from Dracula though which means son of the dragon.


It’s more so a dragon connection than devil
In this case, it means both things actually. Draculea (Dracula) means both the son of the Dragon and the son of Dracul (the devil).

It means Dragon in a more direct way because Vlad II was part of the Societas Draconistarum, with Vlad III's father being part of the organization.
However, it also means son of the Devil because Vlad Tepes' father was actually named/called "Vlad II Dracul" which literally means/evolved to mean Devil in Romanian. His ruthless and more sadistic methods of killing and punishing people also lead to this 'son of the devil' monicker.

On top of that, the biblical book of Revelations uses the image of a red dragon to depict the devil and his minions.

It's basically historical context VS modern connotation. And knowing Oda, I firmly believe that we should keep in mind both options. Especially the one that makes more sense (Devil) since you know, imo, I don't personally seeing Mihawk being "the son of the Dragon" going anywhere.
In romanian, Vlad the impaler is not his name, his name is Vlad Dracul, for some reason he's called that in english
 
Was someone trying to downplay Mihawk's connection to vampires/devils? Lol

Almost as weird as that, though, is this basic idea as it is without a narrative connection. Like there's no reason for Oda to make Mihawk the grandson of Imu's ancient cousin or whatever
Do you think perona is connected to imu too?
 
Nerona Perona? Probably not, but it's so irrelevant that I could see Oda confirming it just out of amusement that anyone really gives a shit
Thats the point tho, its not Mihawk about having specific themes (like hawk, dracula, and so on) like every character has but doing gymnastic to link it to imu somehow despite it not following the slightest with his place in the story
 
Thats the point tho, its not Mihawk about having specific themes (like hawk, dracula, and so on) like every character has but doing gymnastic to link it to imu somehow despite it not following the slightest with his place in the story
Well if I'm honest, I don't believe that Imu even had to exist in this story. By itself, his existence seems to me like a way to tie shit together unnecessarily and make a bigger, classic narrative at the expense of a more unique and less cliched story. Long story short, this is why the Matrix sequels sucked ass.

I think Mihawk as a rival to both Shanks and Zoro is enough and now he's also the strength of a Yonko almost singlehandedly. So I don't care either way about a tie to Imu, but I will say it's a pretty considerable coincidence that the quintessential cross wielding European swordsman shares this distinct feature with none other than the devil.
 
Top