Status
Not open for further replies.
Ragnir's ice feat is indeed hype, but it's just another example of a game over move, it means that he has an attack that has to be dodged no matter what, other top tiers have their own versions of killshots
 

ZenZu

The only one who can beat me is me
Ragnir's ice feat is indeed hype, but it's just another example of a game over move, it means that he has an attack that has to be dodged no matter what, other top tiers have their own versions of killshots
No they don't. Not via this lvl of hax. An omen nuke or simply defending with haki would counter their killshots for the most part.

This must be dodged afawk. Unless you have something above Imu lvl Omen nuke + Imu lvl haki. Or a very very specific counter we don't know.
 
Assuming Ragnir is the one who put the Galley-La on ice and only ragnir can undo their freeze, it just means:
1) It's genuine hax but only activates when you get hit clean — otherwise, Loki would've frozen Imu by now.

Hell, Loki hit Imu clean and didn't decide to freeze him — if it was such a sure-kill move, why didn't Loki freeze Imu then and there? Could chalk it up to PIS perhaps

2) Imu didn't really try very hard to break the ice, he just sent a random nameless explosion to it. What if someone coated in strong haki or with their own hax was inside, could that work?

3) If it is a one-shot kill, we both know that it wouldn't be as easy as that in any actual 1v1 between Loki/Ragnir and a top-tier. Sure, if it lands it could be a one-shot kill, but all it'd mean is the top-tier will have to dodge or block Ragnir and avoid getting hit clean. It's like Akainu's Meigou, Crocodile's moisture drain, Magellan's poison etc... It's just another ability you have to play around as opposed to proof that Loki actually neg-diffs top-tiers.

Take Kizaru for example — he'd run circles around Loki so good luck trapping Kizaru in ice.
All those things you mentioned aren’t true one shots like this one. If even Imu can’t break Ragnir’s ice, you know what that implies for the rest of the cast, right? Fucking Kuma tanked through Meigou for example, that shit is easily physically blockable by top-tiers (at least theoretically).
 
No they don't. Not via this lvl of hax. An omen nuke or simply defending with haki would counter their killshots for the most part.

This must be dodged afawk. Unless you have something above Imu lvl Omen nuke + Imu lvl haki. Or a very very specific counter we don't know.
Could Law break out of it?
 
There's simply no set up, no gain, no logic about Zolo vs Shamrock.

You already has Mihawk, then why Shamrock? Also, Shamrock is too narratively important to end up as an Zolo opponent.
King of hell vs owner of Cerberus

Also, Gandhi doesn't really stick out as a number 2 to fight Zoro, while Shamrock does.

Mihawk isn't evil nor a DF user, like the majority of Zoro opponents are
 
Loki is a much better fit for Shamrock. Order of people most likely to least likely to beat Shamrock:

1. Loki
2. Luffy
3. Shanks
4. Dragon
5. Blackbeard
6. Zoro
7. Sabo (this is a meme matchup which is oddly popular for some reason)
Luffy, Shanks, Drag-on and Teach aren't even in the discussion lmao, they're not going to fight a stoic underling character. Teach and Luffy are obviously for Imcel, and Drag-on would get paired up with Garling, who's done more explicitly evil than Shamrock and is in his age range. Shanks is just not working either
 
Luffy, Shanks, Drag-on and Teach aren't even in the discussion lmao, they're not going to fight a stoic underling character. Teach and Luffy are obviously for Imcel, and Drag-on would get paired up with Garling, who's done more explicitly evil than Shamrock and is in his age range. Shanks is just not working either
Yes, Loki is easily in 1st place while Luffy is a distant second.

Luffy has that one page of talking about an “evil Shanks” with one of those guards going for him
Shanks is Shamrock’s identical twin brother
Dragon failed to save Shamrock from the CDs at GV
Blackbeard has history with the Figarlands

Zolo and Scrubo have basically nothing going for them with regards to fighting Shamrock, other than being powerful underlings of guys directly opposed to Imu. And Zoro is already guaranteed to fight Venus
 
There are plenty of other powerful CDs that EoS Sabo can fight, like Warcury. He has no ties to Shamrock in particular, other than the two being on opposing sides
Sure, I had Sabo vs Shamrock for quite some time:

I have Dragon vs Garling too, and so Sabo vs Shamrock makes even more sense because:

- the HKs were hyped to be a fight for the revs, and Shamrock is HK's leader while Sabo is Rev's chief of staff;
- both are kind of the same figure: "brother of" and the "child"/protegé of the big figure and both have climbed the ranks to be the highest ranking person under them (in Shamrock's case, under the Gorosei rank as a whole);
- last, both are in that double spread.
 
King of hell vs owner of Cerberus
This is really cinge lol. Typical reddit theory, "both has hell parallels". No, Shamrock is too important for Zolo. ZKK lvl theory.

Also, Gandhi doesn't really stick out as a number 2 to fight Zoro, while Shamrock does.

Mihawk isn't evil nor a DF user, like the majority of Zoro opponents are
Pissjuro is a Imu's underling side character swordsman, he fits perfectly for Zolo.

And no, Mihawk can be not evil, but that doesn't disqualifies him for bein an opponent lol. You could argue at least Shiryu will kill him lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top