Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Perhaps. But I don't think so.
Sure
The shift is not about me, it's a shift in about the way you are all replying. Perhaps I'm the only one noticing. But this is very strikefull.
He said "nameless is like evil logiko lol" and you proceeded to dunk on him for 3 pages with dehumanizing assrtion about a potential ALT. I asked you to stop showing you that it was going too far, you said, I quote:
"
"
Time to get some backbone and take responsibility for once.
What I saw is people who weren't pleased with someone backing me up for once and used the very first occasion and argument to relieve their frustration. This is a form of bully behavior, I should know, I've experienced that many time.
Are you gonna personnally attack every person who defend me here?
What if Blax's religion and his or my political view are somewhat contradicting? Do you need to call him a fake an fraudulent man for that? Do you need to dunk on him for 3 pages for that?
Again, throwing just random jab as people is not a viable debate strategy if you don't have an ethical reason to do it.
Centrist * Leftist are usually against that.
Sure
The shift is not about me, it's a shift in about the way you are all replying. Perhaps I'm the only one noticing. But this is very strikefull.
He said "nameless is like evil logiko lol" and you proceeded to dunk on him for 3 pages with dehumanizing assrtion about a potential ALT. I asked you to stop showing you that it was going too far, you said, I quote:
"
"Time to get some backbone and take responsibility for once.
What I saw is people who weren't pleased with someone backing me up for once and used the very first occasion and argument to relieve their frustration. This is a form of bully behavior, I should know, I've experienced that many time.
Are you gonna personnally attack every person who defend me here?
What if Blax's religion and his or my political view are somewhat contradicting? Do you need to call him a fake an fraudulent man for that? Do you need to dunk on him for 3 pages for that?
Again, throwing just random jab as people is not a viable debate strategy if you don't have an ethical reason to do it.
Centrist * Leftist are usually against that.
Children should be able to request new parents if they hate their current ones, and can prove abuse/neglect in court.
But then we would need foster care systems based around actually homing children, not the government infiltrating these programs to sex traffic children.
The biggest issues with parenthood is that you can bang somebody and then pretty much have your own slave for 18 years.
Children need functional social support to actually reroute them from their shitty parents to people who actually care about kids regardless of what dick and pussy made them, or how they were created in general.
The greatest slave caste in history is children taught they had to obey the people who fucked to make them.
But then we would need foster care systems based around actually homing children, not the government infiltrating these programs to sex traffic children.
The biggest issues with parenthood is that you can bang somebody and then pretty much have your own slave for 18 years.
Children need functional social support to actually reroute them from their shitty parents to people who actually care about kids regardless of what dick and pussy made them, or how they were created in general.
The greatest slave caste in history is children taught they had to obey the people who fucked to make them.
You really think calling someone an alt is... dehumanising? Christ.
Also misrepresenting me. I had issues with what I perceive to be a fatal flaw in his religious dedication. Lmfao.
Main character syndrome.
It proves him lacking in character and calls into question his behaviour of constantly quoting verses. Almost feels like performative faith, so yes.
Welcome to the setting of the greatest grooming scandal of mankind if they ever push this through. I know nary a child who hasn't 'hated their current parents' at one point. If you think you can trust courts to be impartial, you'd have to be insane.
I seriously agree.
Indeed.
It literally means "you are not real, every one of your words are meaningless, you are just the words of another perso, you don't exist". You could say "you are not human", it would have the same effect bro. In the context of a jokly interaction, I can agree that it can be funny. But this was not a joke and it's was not a kind interaction.
Sure
>>
Ergo, you are a bully
Indeed.
You really think calling someone an alt is... dehumanising? Christ.
Sure
>>
Ergo, you are a bully
