Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
This is what people would say to us every day without moderation. This is why I said there was a shift, until less than a week ago, these people maintained a certain form of respect, but the moment I started to ask a lot of question about their contradictions, it was completely gone. Okama went from "I think I can agree with you" to straight up insult and calling me a poison in a matter of dayz simply because I refused to kneel in front of his belief system. It's revelating of the instability of their values. Gladly for us.
You mean getting punched and kicked just for the fun of a group of kids ? Well, yeah, I lived that.
You mean getting punched and kicked just for the fun of a group of kids ? Well, yeah, I lived that.
We as in "Humanity" like you said.
Because I supported the Carrot For Nakama train ? Are you sure you are not mistaking me with one of the weirdos of this thread? I remember clearly stating many times directly to carrot fans that I despised any kind of sexualization of the character including when Oda did it and I don't remember this kind of stupidity sent toward me.
People (tried) to dunk on me because of my weird storytelling takes (that are still relevant today btw) nothing more.
As for my sensitivity... What interest would I have to fake it exactly?
My feelings are perfectly fine don't worry. Your little littles jabs are merely warm wind to me. What I don't like is when people use me to attack someone else.
Because I supported the Carrot For Nakama train ? Are you sure you are not mistaking me with one of the weirdos of this thread? I remember clearly stating many times directly to carrot fans that I despised any kind of sexualization of the character including when Oda did it and I don't remember this kind of stupidity sent toward me.
People (tried) to dunk on me because of my weird storytelling takes (that are still relevant today btw) nothing more.
As for my sensitivity... What interest would I have to fake it exactly?
My feelings are perfectly fine don't worry. Your little littles jabs are merely warm wind to me. What I don't like is when people use me to attack someone else.
No, I would have notice, Being called a furry I remember, pedo, never. This is not the kind of thing that I laugh at. What I remember tho, is people dunking on a member who had very weird takes for this reason at the beginning (don't remember his name).
To be honest, I feel like Carrot is very human-like. So I don't understand the furry appeal and I find it gross in her case.
I got interested with her because I was just very happy that Oda focused on a female character in a strawhat way for once. People calling me furry for this reason were ridiculous to me.
To be honest, I feel like Carrot is very human-like. So I don't understand the furry appeal and I find it gross in her case.
I got interested with her because I was just very happy that Oda focused on a female character in a strawhat way for once. People calling me furry for this reason were ridiculous to me.
Perhaps. But I don't think so.
Sure
The shift is not about me, it's a shift in about the way you are all replying. Perhaps I'm the only one noticing. But this is very strikefull.
He said "nameless is like evil logiko lol" and you proceeded to dunk on him for 3 pages with dehumanizing assrtion about a potential ALT. I asked you to stop showing you that it was going too far, you said, I quote:
"
"
Time to get some backbone and take responsibility for once.
What I saw is people who weren't pleased with someone backing me up for once and used the very first occasion and argument to relieve their frustration. This is a form of bully behavior, I should know, I've experienced that many time.
Are you gonna personnally attack every person who defend me here?
What if Blax's religion and his or my political view are somewhat contradicting? Do you need to call him a fake an fraudulent man for that? Do you need to dunk on him for 3 pages for that?
Again, throwing just random jab as people is not a viable debate strategy if you don't have an ethical reason to do it.
Centrist * Leftist are usually against that.
Sure
The shift is not about me, it's a shift in about the way you are all replying. Perhaps I'm the only one noticing. But this is very strikefull.
He said "nameless is like evil logiko lol" and you proceeded to dunk on him for 3 pages with dehumanizing assrtion about a potential ALT. I asked you to stop showing you that it was going too far, you said, I quote:
"
"Time to get some backbone and take responsibility for once.
What I saw is people who weren't pleased with someone backing me up for once and used the very first occasion and argument to relieve their frustration. This is a form of bully behavior, I should know, I've experienced that many time.
Are you gonna personnally attack every person who defend me here?
What if Blax's religion and his or my political view are somewhat contradicting? Do you need to call him a fake an fraudulent man for that? Do you need to dunk on him for 3 pages for that?
Again, throwing just random jab as people is not a viable debate strategy if you don't have an ethical reason to do it.
Centrist * Leftist are usually against that.
