[FNZ] Salem of Lies TOS II: Salem's New Threat

Are you excited to play Town of Salem?


  • Total voters
    16
You got the nerve to ask that? Out of curiosity? Lololol

Because you've given me very little to townread. You've been inactive, largely reactive, and coasting on the sidelines while others have been driving the game.
I don't think you understand by what I meant when I said tangible reasons. The operative word being *tangible* as in valid, empirical, substantial reasons for scum reading me, or at least not trusting to see me in the lens of a town player.

Your sole point of contention on me is informing earlier that you misused a fallacy (wifom) when Fuji called you out and you rationalized your stance on my slot from there. Everything else your saying is word salad.
 
I have my own case anyways so saying there is no case is just lying.

You contradicted yourself.
You soft defended a guy that almost certainly scum.
You resorted to wifom when called out.
In which I answered before. Not sure why you're still stuck with it. You're not confrimed anyway so not sure why people will follow your lead. But I would look at the people who will jump that wagon.
 
I don't think you understand by what I meant when I said tangible reasons. The operative word being *tangible* as in valid, empirical, substantial reasons for scum reading me, or at least not trusting to see me in the lens of a town player.

Your sole point of contention on me is informing earlier that you misused a fallacy (wifom) when Fuji called you out and you rationalized your stance on my slot from there. Everything else your saying is word salad.
Chat gpt?
 
In which I answered before. Not sure why you're still stuck with it. You're not confrimed anyway so not sure why people will follow your lead. But I would look at the people who will jump that wagon.
Okay so your defense breaks down to:

- you made a mistake defending a player
- you don't think other players should capitalize on that mistake you made
- you didn't refute what Fuji said but then attacked me for simply stating you were wifoming

This isn't compelling evidence to town read you given you've been entirely aggressively defensive as a reaction to pressure on your slot fwiw
 
Okay so your defense breaks down to:

- you made a mistake defending a player
- you don't think other players should capitalize on that mistake you made
- you didn't refute what Fuji said but then attacked me for simply stating you were wifoming

This isn't compelling evidence to town read you given you've been entirely aggressively defensive as a reaction to pressure on your slot fwiw
1. I didn't make a mistake for defending because it wasn't a defense. Lol. I already explained this.
2. If they still use rhat same.argument even afywr explaining then it's beyond control
3. It was not wifom, it was giving an example of possibility.
4. You showed and threw shade. Many people talked and you chose to ride on what Fuji was doing. You're barely unnoticeable D1 for the record.
 
1. I didn't make a mistake for defending because it wasn't a defense. Lol. I already explained this.
You didn't.

2. If they still use rhat same.argument even afywr explaining then it's beyond control
So your argument against it was pointless then, you agree yourself lol.

3. It was not wifom, it was giving an example of possibility.
That's what wifom is. Its literally predicated on a person arguing what would be expected, so subverting it as a deniable outcome. Basically meaning your arguing what would be expected because in the circumstances.

4. You showed and threw shade. Many people talked and you chose to ride on what Fuji was doing. You're barely unnoticeable D1 for the record.
What shade? Saying you don't know what wifom is?
 
Top